Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Camelot Refound?



The Peyton Manning era Colts were one of the most consistent, dominant forces the league has ever seen for an extended period of time. Sure, they lost some flukey playoff games, and disappointed by only winning one Super Bowl and reaching 'just' two. That said, when your team wins 10, 12, 12, 14, 12, 13, 12, 14, 10 games in nine straight seasons, then you earn the respect you have. Peyton Manning was the head, but it was really about a perfect mix in Indianapolis, built in the vision created by Bill Polian (find a QB, get players around the QB, get guys to get to the other team's QB) and executed by Tony Dungy. Jim Irsay was the King, the man that foot the bill, but it was the Princes in Polian, Manning and Dungy that made it all work. It was Camelot, playing out in that loud dome (and then slightly less loud dome) for a decade, and it was beautiful. In revolutionized the way football was played, making the no-huddle less of a gimmick and more of a standard, making wide-open passing games geared to make 4,000 yard seasons ordinary, the norm.

The Colts entered into Camelot in 2002 after spending four years building it (The Manning-Mora era), and were there for nine years. Then it all went to hell. Polian's magic lessened in the draft, and Manning's body betrayed him. Dungy had left, replaced by a figurehead leader who had little ability as a coach outside of getting his players to like him. It was staggering how quickly it all fell apart. 14-2 one year, and then 2-14 two years later. Sure, Manning, who has basically proven through that decline just how staggeringly invaluable he was, was gone, but so were other guys like Marvin, Edge, Sanders, Brackett, Clark and others that left after last year's housecleaning. The Colts were back to what they were before the Manning era, which meant they were back to irrelevance. After years of getting the maximum amount of prime-time games, the Colts got 15 one PM games this season. Enter Prince Andrew.

Andrew Luck was lucky in a way that he didn't replace Peyton Manning directly, but replaced what could only be described as the worst QB to ever play for the Colts (Curtis Painter) and the guy who is infamous for running out of the back of the end zone (Dan Orlovsky). Andrew Luck, though, was the guy who was picked to carry that torch, to be the Young to Peyton's Montana, the Rodgers to Peyton's Favre. Andrew Luck has been about as good as advertised. His overall numbers in standard ways of measurement seem ordinary, but when you take into account the context (his brilliance on 3rd Downs, his volume of deep throws, his lack of a good run-game or o-line) he's so much more than that. He was absolutely brilliant against Miami, four weeks after outplaying Aaron Rodgers. But the Colts return to prominence has so many more layers than just Andrew Luck. It actually starts with one man, the main man, Jim Irsay.

Jim Irsay had one of the hardest decisions in NFL History last March. Irsay and the people around him were sure Andrew Luck would be great. He had a lot more long-term value than Peyton Manning had. He would be there for 15 years, while Peyton, if he even played, for only five. But that "if he even played part" was the real killer. Peyton Manning was one of the ultimate 'Deal or No Deal' gambles. Take the risk and resign him, he could have very well never recovered and been a money pit that Irsay would be paying into for years. Of course, the other side of the risk is that Peyton Manning could have turned into what he has turned into (the best QB in the NFL in 2012) just as easily. Irsay even had questions outside of the QB.

For years, Bill Polian ran the Colts. He was the true Boss. No one gave Irsay credit outside of his ability to stay away from the football stuff. It worked brilliantly for a long time, but it all turned in Week 16 of 2009, when Polian made the decision to forego 16-0 to rest. It worked (the Colts did reach the Super Bowl), but Polian made a mess of the PR side of the decision, and became more clammed and dictatorial in the months and years following. That all was fine when the team was a 12+ win a year team, but when they fell apart after the Brain left (Manning) Polian was exposed, in a way. That team was built for Peyton Manning, and Manning was gone, and then the team wasn't built for anything. Irsay had his chance to take the team back, to became a vocal owner again, to stop sitting in the darkness and ceding control to Polian, and he took it. He made the decision, and really, after firing Polian, the Manning decision was pretty much set.

Irsay wanted to start a "New Era", and he did it in full. He cut Manning, but then more quietly cut Joseph Addai, Dallas Clark and Gary Brackett on the same day a couple weeks later. In a span of a fwe weeks, Four of the most important players of the 2006-2010 Colts were gone. This really was a New Era, and Irsay was in more control. He brought in his guy in Ryan Grigson, a rising scouting star in Philadelphia, and they brought in their coach (Chuck Pagano) a football lifer who was beloved by the Baltimore defense. Together, they drafted Andrew Luck, and the 'New Era' was set into place.

In April, the first steps were taken, as in the span of three days, the Colts, in Ryan Grigson's first draft, the Colts landed Andrew Luck, Coby Fleener, Dwayne Allen, T.Y. Hilton and Vick Ballard. Five Offensive Players in one draft. So far, only one has been a disappointment (Fleener), while Luck has been Luck, Dwayne Allen is on a pace to have more catches or yards than Rob Gronkowski or Aaron Hernandez in their rookie season, T.Y. Hilton is showing flashes of brilliance, and Vick Ballard has been a surprisingly good runner. Ryan Grigson hit a home run in his first draft. Next Up is the defense, but this offense is set. It was all working well, until late September, when the coach got his news.

Chuck Pagano's cancer has somehow inspired this team more than I could have imagined. The Colts were obviously fueled by the love of their coach in their dramatic 30-27 win over the Packers, but that emotion seemed to tire them in a soulless 35-9 loss the next week to the Jets, but since it has been four straight wins. Bruce Arians took over the reigns, but Chuck's message still is heard strong in that locker room. His presence is still felt. He'll be there a long time, coaching a great QB and getting new players each year by a GM who aced his first test. The Colts have truly built their "new era" and done it more quickly than anyone could have imagined.

***********************************************************

Of course, here is where I will pause to remember what could have been. There will still be one "What-If?" hanging over the 2012 season, and that is "What-If the Colts kept Peyton Manning?"

There are two scenarios here, one a lot better than the other. The Colts could have either kept Manning and still drafted Luck (the worst-case scenario) or they could have kept Manning and traded the pick for a package that would have garnered a little more than what the Rams got for RGIII (three 1st round picks).

Keep Manning and Pick Luck.) The team is probably better than what they are now, because as good as Luck has been, Peyton has been appreciably better. Peyton Manning looks healthy enough to play at least four years more (unless the nerve issue comes up again, which it shouldn't), which would last through Andrew Luck's rookie deal. The Colts would have had to make a decision to sign Luck long-term without him starting any important games. The Colts are good in the immediate, but probably not as good as what Denver will be this year. Anyway, I don't think this scenario would have ever happened. Let's get to the more interesting one.

Keep Manning, trade the pick.) Peyton Manning stars on this team that could have afforded to resign Clark or others. Even if they don't, they still pick a TE (let's say Allen), and a receiver to pair with Wayne and Avery. To make matters easy, say they get the same package the Redskins gave up, which was future 1st Round Picks and the #6 & 39 picks this year. The #6 pick is probably used to a get a good defensive player, like Dontari Poe or Fletcher Cox to help that D-Line that is an issue in the transition to the 3-4. The #39 was used for Janoris Jenkins, but guys like Cordy Glenn (who's played well) or Alsho Jeffery (can you imagine) were available. Say they pick Jefferey. They leave the draft with some D-Lineman, Alshon Jeffery, Dwayne Allen, Vick Ballard and others. Peyton Manning might not have Luck's mobility, but he has much better pocket presence and this Colts O-Line is better than the Colts o-lines from 2009-2010 anyway. That team is definitely better than this Colts team, and they are probably around 8-1 right now. They probably still lose to Chicago (a loss which is more understandable each week), but Luck is the reason they lost to the Jets in his one truly bad, bad game, and they don't drop the game to Jacksonville. More importantly, the Colts are more of a real contender in a weak AFC. Then, going further, they have extra 1st round picks each of the next two years. Personally, I would have picked this option.

Many people use the justification that Luck is a pick for 15 years, while Manning is for 4-5, but that isn't the only things to consider. It isn't really Luck for 15 vs. Manning for 5, but Luck for 15 vs. Manning for 5 and whoever is next for 10. So, does Manning produce enough value over the next 5 years to make up for the difference? Considering Luck for 15 is impossible to quantify (who knows if Luck is healthy 10 years from now), so there is definitely a chance that Manning could have. Anyway, we will never know, but before many people claim Irsay made the right choice, let's remember just how good Manning has been in 2012 and what could have been in 2012 for the Colts.

NFL 2012: Week 11 Power Rankings & The Rest

Looking Back at Last Week's Picks

Colts (-3)  over  Jaguars  (CORRECT  =  1-0)
Bills (+11)  over  Patriots  (CORRECT  =  2-0)
Giants (-4)  over  Bengals  (WRONG  =  2-1)
Chargers (+3)  over  Buccaneers  (WRONG  =  2-2)  (UPSET)
Broncos (-4)  over  Panthers  (CORRECT  =  3-2)
Titans (+5.5)  over  Dolphins  (CORRECT  =  4-2)
Ravens (-8)  over  Raiders  (CORRECT  =  5-2)
Falcons (-2.5)  over  Saints  (WRONG  =  5-3)
Lions (-2)  over  Vikings  (WRONG  =  5-4)
Seahawks (-6)  over  Jets  (CORRECT  =  6-4)  (LOCK)
49ers (-11)  over  Rams  (WRONG  =  6-5)
Eagles (+1.5)  over  Cowboys  (WRONG  =  6-6)
Bears (-1)  over  Texans  (WRONG  =  6-7)
Steelers (-12)  over  Chiefs  (WRONG  =  6-8)

Week 10: 6-8  (LOCK: 1-0;  UPSET: 0-1)

Year-to-Date: 79-64-3  (LOCK: 8-2;  UPSET: 8-2)

Best Picks: Nothing. Just a bad week. The wheels have fallen off.


Power Rankings

32.) Kansas City Chiefs  (1-8  =  146-256)

I'll admit, I write most of this on Monday, and I don't feel like dropping them ahead of the Jaguars. That was a nice performance, but they couldn't beat Byron Leftwich. That's not a recipe for success. Matt Cassel once again showed exactly why I never trusted this team. Cassel is garbage. The rest of that team isn't. Cassel is so bad that they are the worst team in the NFL.


31.) Jacksonville Jaguars  (1-8  =  127-246)

Blaine Gabbert is so cared to throw picks he is incapable of throwing easy routes. That isn't a problem that is going to suddenly disappear. The bigger issue is what has happened to that defense. They were a top-half defense in 2011, and then added Aaron Ross and Dawan Landry, and have gotten substantially worse.


30.) New York Jets  (3-6  =  175-228)

Although that was a predictable beatdown, I would have thought the Jets would do a little better (not sure why I would have thought that, though). Mark Sanchez looks so lost, and it speaks volumes that despite his average to awful play, Rex hasn't gone to Tebow. What that really shows is Tebow was definitely not Rex's idea, or not even one he wanted to sign off on.


29.) Carolina Panthers  (2-7  =  163-216)

The Panthers again played slow. Cam Newton got little protection, but even when he did, he held the ball way too long and let that Broncos rush get to him a little too much. His throw when being hit that resulted in teh pick was awful. I guess the Panthers defense was OK, but it never really stopped the Broncos during the game.


28.) Oakland Raiders  (3-6  =  191-284)

That was ugly, obviously. I have no idea how they can be so bad despite not turning it over all that much, and despite Carson Palmer having good games mostly every week. If they could have just had a slightly better defense, this team could have been in the Wild-Card mix. Instead, everyone is going to pile on the Palmer trade


27.) Tennessee Titans  (4-6  =  219-311)

Where did that come from? That will almost certainly be the strangest game all season long, with the Titans, who have lost so many embarrassing games, fresh off giving up 51 points, beating the Dolphins, whom everyone considers a respectable team, by 34 in Miami. I have no words. I guess Jake Locker is better than I thought.


26.) St. Louis Rams  (3-5-1  =  161-210)

Really? A tie? Really?? 


25.) Cleveland Browns  (2-7  =  169-211)

Hopefully the Browns used their bye week well. There are winnable games coming up, and a lot of coaches and even players are really playing for their job with new management coming in in the form of Joe Banner and "insert head coach here". I still say the Browns have a good core, but I doubt Haslam and Co. let them play out other than Richardson.


24.) Buffalo Bills  (3-6  =  211-285)

That is a tough loss to comeback from. For the second time this season against the Pats, Fred Jackson fumbled at the 1-yard line (why does it seem like the Pats always get three or four of those a year). Ryan Fitzpatrick nearly threw a perfect pass to win the game, and then followed that up with an abhorrent interception to end it. Their defense played better, and the refs screwed them (does the word 'uncatchable' mean anything?). Anyway, now they go fall back to earth like we all know they will.


23.) Philadelphia Eagles  (3-6  =  156-221)

I feel bad for them because I think if Vick stays in, they win the game. Let's remember that the defense let up just 17 points, but the rest of the team failed them. So in other words, the Eagles from the Juan Castillo era of 2012 are back!


22.) Washington Redskins  (3-6  =  226-248)

Hopefully Mike Shanahan used the bye week to come to the conclusion that just because you have RGIII and this weird offense, doesn't mean the team will always be able to get 4th Downs. I never thought I would say this, but shrink your balls, Shanny.


21.) Arizona Cardinals  (4-5  =  144-173)

The bye has come and gone, and the Cardinals can regroup. They are still in the race, with a win over Seattle, but they need to start winning soon. I have no idea who their QB is going to be, and I doubt it matters. All the Cards need to do is block, but I have little faith they can just learn that overnight.


20.) Cincinnati Bengals  (4-5  =  220-231)

Nice win, and a nice, calm performance by Dalton who took everything underneath, never forced the ball, and looked like the QB he needs to be. AJ Green didn't really call out the Giants, but did say "they have holes in the defense" and AJ Green seemed to be quite knowledgeable, finding them often. Their pass rush returned in full, and overall it was just a monster performance to end a slow death losing streak.


19.) Detroit Lions  (4-5  =  216-222)

I really thought that their climb back to .500 would inspire them to do greater things, but that was a lifeless performance. The Lions made Christian Ponder look like Rich Gannon again, and didn't even stop Peterson, so they can't say that they were focusing on him and not the pass. Good to see Calvin finally catch a TD from Stafford, but that just overscores what a disappoint they have been in fantasy, that most people probably assume they are worse than they are.


18.) Miami Dolphins  (4-5  =  173-186)

Again, what was that? It is hard to tell what teams will fall after an emotional loss, but I guessed right with Miami (guessed wrong with Cincinnati). The Dolphins were flat, and just plain awful, in every phase. Ryan Tannehill had his worst game of the year against an awful defense, and the defense was incapable of doing anything. 


17.) San Diego Chargers  (4-5  =  209-191)

This might be the worst Norv season yet. They have an extremely winnable Wild Card spot and they are letting it slip away. The worst part is unlike 2010, when it was due to a historically shitty Special Teams, this is just because the teams isn't that good anymore. Phil Riveres is pressing because his average receivers don't get open. The rest of the team has bled talent for years and is paying the price.


16.) Dallas Cowboys  (4-5  =  188-204)

Good win, but that offense still is far less than the sum of their parts. The defense stepped up though, and put that awful Maclin TD defense behind them to dominate Foles and the Eagles offense the rest of the game, saving their season. The Cowboys have a shot (though the h2h loss to Seattle hurts) and it starts with these next three home games against Cleveland, Washington and Philadelphia.


15.) Minnesota Vikings  (6-4  =  238-221)

 Christian Ponder is back to emulating Rich Gannon (instead of Rick Mirer) and the Vikings win again. Just a huge game for Minnesota, who keeps a half-game in front of Seattle. The only negative for Minnesota is the games they have left, with both meetings with Chicago and Green Bay still to come. If they can win just one out of those four, they have a shot.


14.) New Orleans Saints  (4-5  =  249-256)

There's a precedent to what the Saints are doing. Coming off their miracle 10-6 2006 season, they started 2007 0-4. After nine games, they were 4-5. The ended 7-9 and far out of a playoff spot, choking it away with losses in Weeks 16-17 to two teams starting backups (the Week 17 game was meaningless). I doubt this year ends as unceremoniously, but the Saints are in bad shape, with three conference losses, and tough games ahead. That said, good on the defense for making a stand when I'm sure no one had any confidence in them.


13.) Indianapolis Colts  (6-3  =  186-201)

They're for real in that they are a .500 type team. Their point differential is no longer indicative of a 6-10 team. If they just play .500 ball from here on out, they'll make the playoffs, being a full two games ahead of any other AFC team (and with a win over the Dolphins). That said, if they want to make a statement, all they really have to do is stay competitive with New England. That's a good enough message that they won't be an easy out come January 5th or 6th.


12.) Tampa Bay Buccaneers  (5-4  =  260-209)

I'm still wrong about Tampa, but they easily could have lost that game. I still don't trust their defense (they won't have QBs just gift-wrap them interceptions like that), but that offense is for real. I never envisioned Josh Freeman being a downfield thrower like that, but he is having a season that is quite close to the years Philip Rivers used to put, with a league-leading YPA.


11.) New York Giants  (6-4  =  267-216)

If you don't want to hear the questions, don't give them the chance. The Giants have allowed themselves to be questioned about their second half swoon once again, and for good reason. Apart from 2008 (where they fall apart a month later), November has been the real culprit, and it has been again. They have two massive games coming up after their bye, with a trip to Washington following their game at home against Green Bay. If they win one, they'll probably hold onto the division, but they better win one of them.


10.) Seattle Seahawks  (6-4  =  198-161)

That was a statement. Russell Wilson continues to play well at home (sadly for them, there is little chance they have a home playoff game), but that team as a whole had a home game against a mediocre team, and did to the Jets what playoff-caliber teams should, destroy them. I love that pitchout WR-Pass by Tate. Random Question, why are so many of these types of plays called for Lefties?


9.) New England Patriots  (6-3  =  299-201)

They have played exactly one good game at home so far, which was their 31-21 win over Denver (where they got extreme fumble luck). Other than that, they've lost to Arizona and dramatically held off the Jets and Bills. This team just isn't that great. Their TEs are banged up, and while they are still great, they can't get deep as much. No one still can get deep consistently, and good defenses will be able to limit them. The question is can the defense show up against a good offense when they need to.


8.) Green Bay Packers  (6-3  =  239-187)

They must have loved what they saw last night, as that division is definitely still in play (will probably come down to a MASSIVE Week 16 game in Chicago), but they still need to figure out a way to get their main receivers deep more often (instead of scheming stuff to get the likes of Tom Crabtree open deep). Their defense has improved so much from last season though, and I really have no idea why, but if it keeps working, who cares. Two big road games coming up though.


7.) Baltimore Ravens  (7-2  =  254-196)

I still say they have a much better chance of holding off the Steelers to win the North than most would give them. They did lose Webb and Ray Lewis, but that doesn't make a team that was 5-1 with them into suddenly a .500 type team. They still have loads of talent, and if that offense can consistently play, then they will be fine. The key for them will be to win two of these three games: @ San Diego, vs Denver and vs New York, assuming they split with Pittsburgh. Can they? I think they can.


6.) San Francisco 49ers  (6-2-1  =  213-127)

Tough loss, and the loss of Smith could be more important. Hopefully he will be fine. The real story is that defense being up-and-down and not being able to consistently get pressure on the QB. They still have a comfortable lead in the division, but hard games remain (vs CHI, @ NO, @ SEA) that makes their situation less comfortable than it would have been had David Akers just hit a 43 yard field goal.


5.) Pittsburgh Steelers  (6-3  =  207-177)

I wanted to drop them further because I don't know if Roethlisberger will play or not, but this is where I would rank them if Ben was healthy in full. The defense continues to play really well despite not getting a ton of pressure on the QB, or intercepting many passes. It is amazing how that defense just went into a different mode when they had to cover for Byron Leftwich. That injury could not have come at a worse time, though, with two of their next three against the Ravens.



4.) Atlanta Falcons  (8-1  =  247-174)

They came two yards away from keeping their dream for 16-0 alive. In the end, it was a little too much, but I like the way their offense played. This team is still better, in my mind, than the 2010 Falcons that went 13-3 and then were obliterated by the Packers in the Divisional Round. Their offense is still deadly, and Tony Gonzalez is becoming the Mariano Rivera of TEs, where I can never imagine him being anything other than very good.


3.) Denver Broncos  (6-3  =  271-189)

That could have been a tricky game. They even trailed 7-0 early, on the road against a team that had been playing better of late. Of course, they proceeded to score the next 29 points. Some quick stats on Denver. They are 2nd in the league with 6.1 yards per play, and tied for 1st in yards per play allowed with 4.8. They lead the NFL in sacks, and in QB Rating. If they had average fumble recovery luck, they would probably be 7-2 right now. Either way, this team still has some challenges, but, assuming Week 17 is meaningful, 13-3 is a possibility.


2.) Chicago Bears  (7-2  =  242-133)

I can't drop them too far. Their fumble luck was bad (three fumbles, all recovered by Houston), but their defense was still dominant, making Matt Schaub look lost and that offense stagnant. If Cutler stays in, that could have been a fun game. The defense, much like they did in the 2010 NFC Title Game, stepped up after Cutler went down, but Campbell was nowhere near Caleb Hanie (at least Hanie in that game).


1.) Houston Texans  (8-1  =  250-143)

That was a huge win. First, it keeps their 1.5 game lead on the AFC (h2h over the 7-2 Ravens, everyone else 6-3 or worse), with just a couple tough games left (@ DET, @ NE). The Texans went into Chicago, played as good defensively against the best defense in the NFL, in the rain. That was not a game the 2007-2009 Texans come close to winning, but the 2012 Texans are a different animal. With Schaub starting, they are now 12-1 in their last 13 games (dating back to 2011). They were the best team in the AFC when Schaub went down last year, and they are clearly the best team in the AFC right now.


Ranking Next Week's Games

14.) Jacksonville Jaguars (1-8)  @  Houston Texans (8-1)  (1:00 - CBS) 

This could get ugly. My guess is Schaub will want to take the poor taste out of his mouth from the awful passing performance against Chicago, and what better way to do that against one of the worst teams in the NFL.


13.) New York Jets (3-6)  @  St. Louis Rams (3-5-1)  (1:00 - CBS)
12.) Cincinnati Bengals (4-5)  @  Kansas City Chiefs (1-8)  (1:00 - CBS)
11.) Miami Dolphins (4-5)  @  Buffalo Bills (3-6)  (TNF - NFLN)  

I call it Mediocrity Sunday. Only the Bengals have any real shot at the playoffs at this point (Miami would, but they lost to the Colts), and they do get the easiest game here. The others are teams already playing out the string of their season. It is amazing how many teams with more than two wins have nothing to play for in reality already.


10.) Arizona Cardinals (4-5)  @  Atlanta Falcons (8-1)  (1:00 - FOX)
9.) Cleveland Browns (2-7)  @  Dallas Cowboys (4-5)  (1:00 - CBS)
8.) New Orleans Saints (4-5)  @  Oakland Raiders (3-6)  (4:05 - FOX)

I call it Likely Blowout Sunday. The Falcons need to step up and blast a team at home for once, especially with a trip to Tampa looming the following week. They'll still win that division, but the #1 seed is no sure bet right now. The Cowboys, if they want any shot at making a run, can't pussy-dick around and drop games to Cleveland. The Saints defense will get another test in Oakland, but their offense should asplode on the Raiders.


7.) Philadelphia Eagles (3-6)  @  Washington Redskins (3-6)  (1:00 - FOX)
6.) Tampa Bay Buccaneers (5-4)  @  Carolina Panthers (2-7)  (1:00 - FOX)
 

I call it (I like this gimmick, by the way) Sad Divisional Sunday. Only the Bucs have a shot, and they get a possible lifeless Carolina team (by the way, Cam Newton's first two years are similar to Josh Freeman's 2010-11 seasons). The Eagles probably without Mike Vick will get a rookie-bowl with RGIII, in his debut in this rivalry, which is by far the least interesting of all the NFC East combinations.


5.) Green Bay Packers (6-3)  @  Detroit Lions (4-5)  (1:00 - FOX)
4.) San Diego Chargers (4-5)  @  Denver Broncos (6-3)  (4:25 - CBS)
 

I call it Fun Divisional Sunday. The Packers and Broncos are two of the hottest teams and they employ the best two QBs in the NFL. The other two would love, love, love to end the Packers and Broncos four-game win streaks. The Chargers were embarrassed in that MNF game, and the Lions love beating down Rodgers. Both could potentially be interesting games.


3.) Indianapolis Colts (6-3)  @  New England Patriots (6-3)  (4:25 - CBS)

I call it Bizarro Sunday. I love that even after the Manning rivalry, this will be an important game. There is a chance it isn't close, because the Colts are closer to a .500 team, but the Pats have been very vulnerable at home this season (barely beating New York and Buffalo). Andrew Luck should have fun against a defense that was hopeless against Mark Sanchez and Ryan Fitzpatrick. 


2.) Chicago Bears (7-2)  @  San Francisco 49ers (6-2-1)  (MNF - ESPN)
 

If both teams are missing their starting QBs, this game probably will be about as competitive (but not as pretty) as if both Cutler and Smith play. If only one is missing, then the game becomes a mismatch. This game has a chance to be a slightly more offense-present version of teh Texans @ Bears game. Should also be a great crowd at Candlestick for a game that is really important in terms of 1st Round Bye implications (and possible division implications with Seattle, and especially Green Bay, breathing down their neck).


1.) Baltimore Ravens (7-2)  @  Pittsburgh Steelers (6-3)  (SNF - NBC)

Here we go again, with or without Ben Roethlisberger. I have a feeling he will play. How good will he be is another matter. The Roethlisberger injury can factor huge into the AFC North race, with the return leg in two weeks at M&T Bank. Should be a fun game like always, and I have to think both defenses show up.


Postseason Projections

AFC

1.) Houston Texans  14-2
2.) Denver Broncos  13-3
3.) Baltimore Ravens  12-4
4.) New England Patriots  11-5
5.) Pittsburgh Steelers  11-5*
6.) Indianapolis Colts  10-6

* - If it is a long term injury with Ben, then drop them out, put the Colts at the #5, and the Chargers at the #6.


NFC

1.) Atlanta Falcons  13-3
2.) Chicago Bears  12-4
3.) San Francisco 49ers  11-4-1
4.) New York Giants  10-6
5.) Green Bay Packers  11-5
6.) Seattle Seahawks  9-7


I'm assuming Smith and Cutler miss no more than one game, and if they both do, it is against each other, so it doesn't really change their matchup.

Thursday, November 8, 2012

NFL 2012: Week 10 Picks

Indianapolis Colts (5-3)  @  Jacksonville Jaguars (1-7)  (IND -3)

This line is about right, even though one team is a full four games better than the other. The Jaguars one the previous matchup on a shocking 80-yard TD by Cecil Shorts to pull out a 22-17 win. The Colts are worse than a 5-3 team, being outscored by 32 points, but they still are better than the Jaguars, who are playing without MJD again (who has terrorized the Colts throughout his career). Road teams usually have a tough time on TNF games, but that goes away when the road team is clearly better (Giants winning 36-7 in Carolina, or what will probably happen Thanksgiving Night in New York, or what happens nearly every Thanksgiving in Detroit). I don't know if the Colts are clearly better, but they are better, and three points is a good value line. Also, if the Colts can get to 6-3, they have a really, really good shot at the playoffs. Huge game for them. They wouldn't want to go to New England coming off a second loss to the Jagaurs.

Colts 24  Jaguars 17  (IND -3)


Buffalo Bills (3-5)  @  New England Patriots (5-3)  (NE -11)

The Patriots, ever since their 'Spygate Revenge' mode wore off sometime around Super Bowl 41.5 in 2007, have been quite bad at covering these huge lines. They've already lost outright once this year with a huge line (to Arizona), but they they covered two weeks ago in London with a similar line. The Bills, let's remember, were up 21-7 on New England before they fell apart with picks and an inability to play the run. They haven't really solved the run issues (though the D-Line is playing better), and I can see the Patriots having another 200+ yard day on the ground. The Patriots secondary is still mostly awful, so I can see the Bills having some success. I hate doing this because I can easily see this game deteriorating into another Patriots romp, but I can't trust Brady and Co. to cover these huge lines when they usually don't, so I guess I'll take the Bills. If I were a betting man, I would stay away.

Bills 24  Patriots 34  (BUF +11)


New York Giants (6-3)  @  Cincinnati Bengals (3-5)  (NYG -4)

The Giants better win this game. Heading into the bye, with the hot Packers on the other end, on a two game losing streak will not make Mr. Coughlin too happy. They'll all hear two weeks of "Here We Go Again." Personally, I think they just were flat outplayed by a rejuvenated Pittsburgh group last weekend. The Bengals, on the other hand, are in a tough spot. They emotionally came to play against Denver, and after losing, this could be a let down. Their Wild-Card chances are about shot at this point, and their season in many ways ended last week. The Bengals still have problems covering receivers and their o-line isn't very good, which is about as bad a matchup for the Giants as possible. The Giants are great on the road (if Larry Tynes hits a field goal in Philadelphia, they are undefeated on the road right now), and I like the value with the line here.

Giants 27  Bengals 20  (NYG -4)


San Diego Chargers (4-4)  @  Tampa Bay Buccaneers (4-4)  (TB -3)

Interesting game here. The last time these two teams met (I'm doing this 'last time these two met' for intra-conference games a lot because all of them happened in 2008, which was probably my favorite regular season of football so ever) the Chargers were rising from the ashes of 4-8 to the playoffs while the Bucs were in a freefall from 9-3 to 9-7 that cost Jon Gruden his job. Right now, the Chargers are in their own freefall after ruining a good start for the second straight season. Philip Rivers and the team finally played well last Thursday, but that was against the Chiefs. They do have more time to prepare for a team that still can't stop the pass. If Rivers can't play well here, just give up on him. The Chargers have a decent run game, so I wouldn't expect Doug Martin to have that type of game. I do like the Chargers in this spot (they aren't that bad going East for 1PM games as a lot of other West Coast teams), but that might just be me underestimating the Bucs. This is a big game for both, but I actually think the Chargers are more out of it with a loss than the Bucs. I'll go with my gut and take the Chargers.

Chargers 31  Buccaneers 23  (SD +3)


Denver Broncos (5-3)  @  Carolina Panthers (2-6)  (DEN -4)
 

The Panthers seemed to have woken up the last two weeks, as Charles Johnson and rookie Luke Kuechly have helped up teh play of that defense. That said, I don't think their defense is close to good enough here. A lot of people were unimpressed with the Broncos last week, but they were playing Cincy off of their bye and still won comfortably. They are a lot better than the Panthers, have the defense to give them fits (they track down runners better than any team I've seen). The Panthers don't for Peyton. Hidden reason: Both Peyton and his Coach have a reason to stick it to Panthers' owner Jerry Richardson, one because Richardson belittled him during the lockout, the other because Richardson fired him. That's enough for me to take the Broncos to cover a low line.

Broncos 34  Panthers 17  (DEN -4)


Tennessee Titans (3-5)  @  Miami Dolphins (4-4)  (MIA -5.5)

I have no read on this game. The Titans are the worst 3-5 team in the NFL (they've been outscored by 126 points), while the Dolphins are one of the better 4-4 teams, but the Dolphins may have a letdown after losing that close, important game last week to Indianapolis. The Dolphins rush defense has been very good (DVOA ranks them #3) and they should limit Chris Johnson. Then again, the Dolphins really might have a let down after losing that game. I can't escape that fact, and that this line, to me, is a little high.

Titans 20  Dolphins 24  (TEN +5.5)


Oakland Raiders (3-5)  @  Baltimore Ravens (6-2)  (BAL -8)

The Raiders have been blown out twice this season, but both were before the bye. Since then, their losses have been close to the Falcons (20-23) and Buccaneers (32-42). The Ravens haven't blown anyone out in a while (say, Week 1 - 44-13 over Cincinnati). The Raiders passing offense should have plays to make against a Ravens team that still can't really rush the passer (Palmer is good at avoiding sacks anway). The key is the other side. Can the Ravens offense do to Oakland what the Bucs did. They definitely have the running back (will Cam Cameron use him is the real question) and the weapons, but Flacco has been spotty. This is really tough because that line is valued about right. The Raiders are better than people think, but in a way, so are the Ravens. They didn't play that well and just won by 10 over a mediocre team. Can't they do the same? I really have no idea (By the way, I can foresee a 5-9 type week coming).

Raiders 20  Ravens 30  (BAL -8)


Atlanta Falcons (8-0)  @  New Orleans Saints (3-5)  (ATL -2.5)

I'm hearing a lot of love for the Saints here. They've definitely played the Falcons well recently (won the last three), but those were different Saints and this is a different Falcons team. They haven't looked particularly good all the time, but they've never seemed like the team that played worse in any of their games. For instance, the Raiders game was only close because of three strange Matt Ryan picks, and they never seemed like they would actually lose to Dallas. The Falcons have been mostly great on the road which is strange, and the Saints have been beatable in every home game (the Eagles just gave that game away). I'll buck convention and go with the team that should shred the Saints secondary with White and Jones, and might actually get their run game going. The fact that the line is below a Field Goal is what clinches it for me, though.

Falcons 34  Saints 27  (ATL -2.5)


Detroit Lions (4-4)  @  Minnesota Vikings (5-4)  (DET -2)

The Lions need this game badly. If they get it, they are, somehow, in the driver's seat for the last Wild Card spot (head-to-head win over Seattle, the only other four loss team in the race) and will avoid a season sweep from the Vikings. The Lions should have won the first meeting in Detroit but were undone by two Special Teams TDs. I can't imagine that happening. Christian Ponder and that passing offense has been awful of late, and the Lions pass defense probably won't be exposed too much. Their rush defense has been good enough. The two points is good value, and it isn't like the Vikings have been that good at home recently.

Lions 26  Vikings 20  (DET -2)


New York Jets (3-5)  @  Seattle Seahawks (5-4)  (SEA -6)

I have an illness. That illness is sticking with this Jets team. Why do I like them here to cover? I have no reasoning. Their defense is good, but has been up-and-down on the road. The Seahawks defense should be able to eliminate any hopes of the Jets having a good day passing the ball. This is the toughest place to play when the Seahawks are good, and they are good. This is a bigger game for the Seahawks, who can't afford to drop back to the pack, while the Jets are all but eliminated at this point. You know what, I'm not going to listen to this lunatic in my brain telling me the Jets are decent, and more importantly, I went through this last week, picking the Vikings to cover in Seattle. Peterson had an amazing day, and they still couldn't do it. Fool me once, shame on you (Vikings), fool me twice, shame on me.

Jets 13  Seahawks 23  (SEA -6)


St. Louis Rams (3-5)  @  San Francisco 49ers  (6-2)  (SF -11)

Unlike the Patriots, the 49ers have done a pretty good job of covering really high lines. Both teams are off byes so there's no advantage gained for the Rams. The 49ers have dominated their division opponents so far, and the Rams have played terribly in their last two games. The 49ers are good enough to eliminate the Rams offense from competing too much. You know what? I don't want to dwell on this too long. I'll take the better team that is a lot better at home.

Rams 10  49ers 27  (SF -11)


Dallas Cowboys (3-5)  @  Philadelphia Eagles (3-5)  (DAL -1.5)

OK, I'm done picking all favorites. I realize the Eagles looked awful on Monday Night, but this is a huge overreaction. The Cowboys are not this much better than the Eagles. Apart from 2009, when the Cowboys had a better team, the Cowboys haven't won a game in Philly since 2007, and have been blown out twice since then, losing 44-6 in 2008 and 31-7 last year. I don't think it will be as bad, but Romo historically struggles with the Eagles, while Vick doesn't with Dallas (3-0 as a starter against the Cowboys). They have the same record. They both don't deserve to be any better. The Eagles match up well with Dallas, who doesn't have the team speed on defense to stay with the Eagles weapons in my opinion. The Eagles have the corners to play with the Cowboys. I'll take the Eagles, especially underdogs.

Cowboys 17  Eagles 27  (PHI +1.5)


Houston Texans (7-1)  @  Chicago Bears (7-1)  (CHI -1)

I just hope this game is as good as I want it to be. I want this to be a close, hard-fought, physical game. I want this to end like 20-17 or 17-16, some low-scoring game defined by excellent defense. Anyway, the matchups favor Houston in my mind. They can run the ball (which is a relative weakness for the Bears' defense). Their d-line could dominate the Bears blockers much more than the Bears doing the same to Houston's o-line. The Bears do have some advantages, like their league-best special teams against one of the league's worst. Their also at home where they tend to play better. This is a bigger game for the Bears, who with a loss would than have a massive game a week from now against, in all likelihood, a similarly 7-2 49ers team in Candlestick. They could go from safe #2 seed to team without a bye quickly. Conversely, the Texans with a loss still have the #1 seed tiebreaker with a slightly flimsy Baltimore team. It means more for the Bears, and I think they sneak it out. I just hope it is a close, tough, physical, good game.

Texans 17  Bears 20  (CHI -1)


Kansas City Chiefs (1-7)  @  Pittsburgh Steelers (5-3)  (PIT -12)

The Chiefs without Stanford Routt against a rejuvanated Steelers offense and defense, who gets to beat up on whoever is taking snaps for the Chiefs? This looks too easy, and the line is really high. I probably won't watch this game (though in the end I probably will). The good news, for once, is Jon Gruden can't slobber over BOTH QBs this time.

Chiefs 10  Steelers 30  (PIT -12)


Enjoy the Games!!

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

NFL 2012: Half-Way Measures Pt. 2


Looking Back at my '10 Underlined Predictions' 

1.) Defenses rerun in force, as no QB throws for 5,000 yards or 40 TDs, and at most one team scores 500 points.

Defenses haven't really returned in force, as scoring and yardage is essentially what it was a year ago, but it is more pervasive and less top-heavy this year. As I predicted, only one team is on pace for 500, as the Pats are on pace for 524. No other team is even on pace for 480. Drew Brees is the only QB on pace for 5,000 yards (5,104), while the next set are all at 4,800 pace. Passing numbers generally decrease as the season goes on as well. The TDs predictions is most likely to be wrong, with Peyton on pace for 40, and Brees and Rodgers on pace for 44.


2.) Andrew Luck and RGIII don't make like Dalton and make the playoffs, but another rookie QB does.

The other rookie QB was Russell Wilson. I might get this absolutely right, and I might get only two or or one of the predictions right. RGIII almost certainly won't make the playoffs. As it stands right now, Luck and Wilson will be there. Luck probably has a better shot, especially if they can win against Jacksonville on Thursday. Wilson's Seahawks are in a dog-fight. That won't get settled soon.


3.) The Cowboys become the Eagles, and the Eagles become, well, the McNabb era Eagles.

What this essentially meant was that the Cowboys would implode like the nebulous group of stars they are, and the Eagles would solidify themselves off of a good finish to 2011 to make the playoffs in 2012. Well, one of those two things certainly happened. The Cowboys have imploded, dropping winnable games in a variety of ways. The Eagles, however, are still the Eagles from 2011 as well, turning the ball over way too much, and not playing sound football. They've also made headlines with the unnecessary firing of Juan Castillo.


4.) The Texans get the AFC's top seed as they capitalize on the league's weakest division.

This one I really locked down. The Texans are the best team in the AFC at 7-1, having beaten the only two -loss team, and having a chance to beat both of the two best three-loss teams. That division isn't as easy because the Colts are decent, but the Texans still have been the best team.


5.) Peyton Manning has one of the three best seasons of any QB in the NFL.

Nailed this one as well. Through the first half, Peyton Manning has had the best season of any QB in the NFL. He leads in the NFL in completion percentage, yards per attempt and passer rating if you want to go conventional (he's also third in yards and TDs too). If you want to go advanced, he leads the NFL in DYAR and DVOA per Football Outsiders, and despite being skeptical of the stat, he leads in ESPN's Total QB Rating to boot.


6.) The Steelers, despite having a defense as old as the city of Pittsburgh itself, will have the NFL's best defense, and LaMarr Woodley will be the centerpiece.

Despite the Steelers have the #1 defense in terms of yards allowed, this was wrong. They've been better, but the best defense has absolutely been Chicago, with San Francisco, Seattle and Houston behind them. The Steelers are coming on though. Despite not getting as much pressure as usual, and still not getting many picks, their pass coverage has been surprisingly excellent so far.


7.) The Falcons do what they do, win a division despite being the 2nd or 3rd most captivating team.

I think I got this one quite right as well. The only captivating thing about the Falcons is that they are undefeated. If they lose next week in New Orleans (possible) or in two weeks in Tampa (possible), they could and probably will, still get the #1 seed and go back to being less captivating than Chicago, San Francisco or New York in the NFC.


8.) There's a surprise sleeper Wild Card team in the AFC, and it isn't one of the two logical choices (Bills or Chiefs).

I got this right and wrong. My thinking that the Bills and Chiefs wouldn't make the playoffs despite getting some preseason love was right on the money. My thinking that the sleeper would be either the Jets, Raiders or Chargers will probably be wrong. The Chargers still have a shot. In reality, the real sleeper I guess is Indy, but San Diego can still get that #6 seed (their conference record will probably be better).


9.) Week 17 will be crazy, and it will probably end with a little bit of 2011 dejavu on NBC.

What this is referring to is how many of the Week 17 games seemed interesting, and I thought it would all end with another winner-take-division game in teh NFC East, with the Giants hosting the Eagles. I was completely wrong. Other than the 6 seed in each conference, and maybe some playoff jockeying, the playoff field might be set by then. I have no idea what game will be the SNF game on Week 17, and it could end with a game where a team needs to win to get in against another teams backups (happened in 2007, when the 13-2 Colts rested against the 9-6 Titans, who beat them to get the #6 seed).


10.) Both Manning's play in Title Games, and mirroring the brother's Harbaugh in 2011, both lose, to the Texans and Bears respectively.

Obviously, this will take a while to actually be right or wrong, but both could easily happen. The Giants probably will have to go on the road in Round 2 again to get there, but it is hard to bet against them. Same with the Broncos, who still need the Pats to slip up at some point to get that #2 seed. The Texans and Bears, though, are my top teams in each conference. They also play this week in what should be a great game.


Okay, so numbers 2 (rookie QBs), 3 (Cowbys & Eagles), 6 (Steelers best defense), 8 (Bills and Chiefs don't make it but either Jets, Raiders or Chargers do) and 9 (Week 17 will be crazy ending with Giants vs. Eagles for NFC East) are either wrong or pointless. Instead, I'll keep numbers 1 (defenses return the favor in 2012), 4 (Texans get AFC #1 seed), 5 (Peyton one of Top-3 QBs), 7 (Falcons win division) and 10 (Both Manning's play in Title Games but lose to Houston and Chicago) and add five more predictions for the 2nd half.


2nd Half Predictions.

1.) The Ravens, somehow and someway, win their division despite no one thinking they are any good.

At this point, no one thinks the Ravens are close to a 6-2 type team, or even the best team in the AFC North. The Steelers have risen off the mat to contend, and are now one game back with both head-to-heads to come. That said, I like this Ravens team still. They are so damn resourceful, which they've been for so many years. If the Ravens just split with Pittsburgh, they are in great shape. The first tiebreaker after head-to-head for a division race is the division record. Neither have lost one yet. The Ravens still have to go to Cincy, while the Steelers still have to go to Cleveland (and play them at home as well). Then comes record in common games. The Steelers have already played both their uncommon games (Jets, Titans) and went 1-1. The Ravens have played theirs as well (New England, Houston) and went 1-1. It will be close, but I'll take the team with the one game lead right now.


2.) The Packers and Steelers become the 'Hot Wild-Card team no-one wants to play' entering the playoffs.

The Packers are 6-3 and the Steelers are 5-3. Both teams were 2-3. Both teams have QBs playing really well (I'm serious, Ben is playing well). Their defenses are playing better, and their offenses are playing great. The Steelers have a better shot at the division (the Packers have an additional game to make up), but I think the Ravens will hang on in the North. These will probably both be the #5 seeds, and that sets up for two interesting first round games, no matter who the opponents are. I can already see tons of pundits picking the Packers and Steelers to make runs, because that is what they do. I don't know if they will or not, but I think these will be the two teams that the public will get pounded with come January.


3.) Atlanta loses either @ New Orleans or @ Tampa Bay, but still gets the top seed, and for once, doesn't flame out in their first playoff game.

Atlanta can't go undefeated. The only team to reach 8-0 that I can remember being worse was the 2006 Colts. They ended up winning the Super Bowl, but they won quite a few close games and their run defense was pathetic. They ended up losing a strange game in Dallas in Week 11. The Falcons have passed all their tests, but that division, while still being completely in Atlanta's control, is not as bad anymore. In the next three weeks they will go to New Orleans and Tampa Bay. I can't see the Falcons winning both. Those are high powered offenses that can play a shoot-out with the Falcons, and both are desperate in the Wild-Card race. That said, the Falcons should still get the #1 seed. The Bears are 7-1, but their schedule is tougher going forward, with two road divisional games as well, and a trip to San Francisco and Arizona. This all said, no one seems to care about what the Falcons are doing because they haven't won a playoff game in the Ryan/Smith era, and the last time they got the #1 seed they were blasted 48-21 at home by the Packers. I think they win at least one playoff game. The NFC is really tough, but teams rarely lose four straight playoff games. Manning and Brady have both had streaks of three straight playoff losses, but they didn't let it go to 4. I don't think Ryan and Smith do it either. This team is better set to win, with a better passing game and an option outside of just Roddy White in Julio Jones, Their defense is also better, with Asante Samuel joining the fold. I think they can beat any team in one game at home. Can they do both, probably not. I'm thinking about dropping this prediction because this and my prediction of Giants vs Bears as a Title Game conflict, but who cares. Spread out my risk, I guess.


4.) NBC doesn't get any good choices for Week 17, but takes good use of its flex-powers before that.

In 2007, 11 of the 12 playoff spots were locked up before Week 17. The only one remaining was if the Titans or Browns would get the #6 seed in the AFC. This left NBC nothing, and they chose to flex in the Titans @ Colts, where the Colts, locked into the #2 seed, rested their starters and the Titans flew into the playoffs. That was a stark contrast to 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, where the last game was a winner-take-all division battle (Broncos @ Chargers, Eagles @ Cowboys, Rams @ Seahawks, and Cowboys @ Giants). This Week 17 looks dim. The races in the AFC South, East, West and NFC East, South and West should be wrapped up by then. The two Norths could be up for grabs, with the Bears and Packers in the NFC and Ravens and Steelers in the AFC. Sadly, none of those play each other. I guess we could see a Packers vs Vikings game, or a Steelers vs Browns type game. This is the risk of making the Week 17 games all inter-division matchups, because then it makes it harder to have a winner-take-all for a Wild Card type game.

That said, they can really use those flex powers. The last couple years, NBC hasn't flexed out too many games, but they have a shot here. Flex Scheduling starts in Week 11. Here is the scheduled games in Weeks 11-16: Ravens @ Steelers, Packers @ Giants, Eagles @ Cowboys, Lions @ Packers, 49ers @ Patriots, and Chargers @ Jets. The games in Week 11, 12 and 15 seem like locks to stay (Ravens @ Steelers, Packers @ Giants and 49ers @ Packers), but the other three seem ripe for change.

Week 13.) NBC might keep Eagles @ Cowboys because it is Dallas, but NBC shouldn't. Anyway, there are a lot better options for Week 13. There are many games with serious playoff implications. Unless the Lions or Colts crash, their matchup could be a prime candidate. If the Bucs and Seahawks stay afloat, their visits to Denver and Chicago seem like good choices as well. The best option, depending on what happens to Miami, the Patriots @ Dolphins game could be a good choice as well.

Week 14.) Lions @ Packers might be a good game with huge Wild Card implications, but I don't think it is truly safe here. Chargers @ Steelers could be the best option between two likely wild-card competitors. Bears @ Vikings could be an option as well if the Vikings stay afloat. Overall, I think Chargers @ Steelers takes this spot, and it should.

Week 16.) Just remove Chargers @ Jets right now. It might be an important game for the Chargers, but there is little chance it means anything for the Jets. The clear candidate is the other New York team, with the Giants @ Ravens. If the Seahawks play well, their game hosting the 49ers could be good as well, but Giants @ Ravens looks like the best game here.


5.) The NFL finally becomes what it doesn't want to, as way too many teams repeat in the playoffs. 

Ever since I can remember, at least 5 playoff teams fail to make it back the next year. Last season, there were six teams in the playoffs that didn't make it in 2010 (Texans, Broncos, Bengals, 49ers, Giants, Lions). This year, there is a legitimate chance it could be just 2. The Texans, Patriots, Broncos are almost assured of getting in, and it is hard to see either the Ravens or Steelers both being caught. If they all make it, five of the six will get back in, and the funniest part? The new team could be the old team, the Colts. Over at the NFC, the Giants, Packers, 49ers, and Falcons seem all like locks. The Bears and Seahawks could be new (the Bears probably make it if Cutler doesn't get hurt), but there is a chance that the Lions (especially with their head-to-head win over Seattle) can get back again. There will be some familiar faces in January, but in different locations. The Falcons were a Wild-Card and probably will be the #1 seed. The two bye teams from 2012 could easily be the #3-4 seeds from 2011 in the AFC. It will still be new, but a lot of the same teams. Sounds a lot like the NBA. But this is what the NFL created by placing so much importance on passing.


Picks coming later in the Week. Can't believe the 1st Half is over, but I think the 2nd Half will be really fun.

NFL 2012: Half-Way Measures Pt. 1




In Part 1 of my two-part look back at the first half of the NFL season, I'll take a quick trip down my (surprisingly good) preseason predicted standings, and then give out my first half awards.


Looking Back at my Preseason Predicted Standings

AFC

AFC East

1.) New England Patriots  12-4  (4)

So far so good. Their schedule is easy enough that going 12-4 is pretty reasonable. They probably won't have the 4 seed if they do, though.


2.) Buffalo Bills  8-8

Got this one wrong, but let's be honest, a lot of people did.


3.) New York Jets  7-9

This has a chance to be right on, but the Jets easily could do worse.


4.) Miami Dolphins  3-13

This is easily my worst AFC pick. I even made this my lock Under (for 7 wins) which is embarrassing.


AFC North

1.) Pittsburgh Steelers  12-4  (3)

This didn't look so good early, but 12-4 is not ridiculous, and the Steelers should make the playoffs.


2.) Baltimore Ravens  9-7

Because of a 5-1 start, they almost certainly won't go 9-7, but was I really that far off?


3.) Cincinnati Bengals  7-9

Despite a 3-1 start, I might have overestimated the Bengals in 2012.


4.) Cleveland Browns  5-11

They probably won't win five games, but they are good enough.


AFC South

1.) Houston Texans  13-3  (1)

Oh yeah! Unless Schaub gets injured again, 13-3 is the expectation, and they could do better.


2.) Indianapolis Colts  6-10

Before the season, I debated putting them at 8-8, but felt that would be too homerish. Anyway, I was wrong with the record, but at least I had them 2nd in the division.


3.) Tennessee Titans  5-11

Despite being putrid, they have a reasonable shot to make it to 5 wins.


4.) Jacksonville Jaguars  5-11

They have no reasonable shot to make it to 5 wins.


AFC West

1.) Denver Broncos  12-4  (2)

Again, there's a chance of hitting this, and if it does, there is a good chance to getting that #2 seed.


2.) Oakland Raiders  10-6  (5)

/wallowing head in shame
//they aren't that bad, though


3.) San Diego Chargers  9-7  (6)

This has a chance of being right. Still can't believe they dropped that game against Cleveland.


4.) Kansas City Chiefs  4-12

So many people loved KC and now have egg on their face. I am egg-free.


NFC

NFC East

1.) New York Giants  13-3  (1)

I overestimated them a little. 13-3 is still possible, but really unlikely. They still should make the playoffs though.


2.) Philadelphia Eagles  11-5  (5)

I have no idea. I have a sickness with the Eagles, really.


3.) Dallas Cowboys  7-9

This has a good shot of landing perfectly. They might do a little better with the schedule they have left, though.


4.) Washington Redskins  6-10

This has a good shot of landing perfectly.


NFC North

1.) Chicago Bears  12-4  (2)

This has a good shot of landing, and the Bears actually could easily go better than 12-4.


2.) Green Bay Packers  11-5 (5)

Another pick that could easily be right. The Pack could do better, but I still don't think this is a great team.


3.) Detroit Lions  7-9

Another pick that has a good shot of landing. I have to say, I picked a lot of teams to be average (between 7-9 wins) and almost all of them are in that range.


4.) Minnesota Vikings  3-13

This is the equivalent of picking the Dolphins to go 3-13 in the AFC. Just wrong.


NFC South

1.) Atlanta Falcons  10-6 (3)

I think they are closer to this than the 13-3 or 14-2 they will end up with, but at least I picked them to win teh division.


2.) New Orleans Saints  9-7

Probably underestimated how much Sean Payton meant, and how ill-equipped they are to run Spagnuolo's stuff.


3.) Carolina Panthers  7-9

They probably won't win seven, but, and I can't stress this enough, CAM IS NOT THE PROBLEM.


4.) Tampa Bay Buccaneers  5-11

I thought about picking them to do worse, but I'll admit I was wrong about Greg Schiano.


NFC West

1.) Seattle Seahawks  9-7  (4)

They won't win the division, but they have a good shot of getting 9 wins and getting into the playoffs.


2.) San Francisco 49ers  9-7

I bought into the regression theory. But sometimes teams that get better just stay better.


3.) Arizona Cardinals  6-10

Somehow, even with a 4-0 start, I might have overestimated the Cardinals wins, but this was pretty accurate.


4.) St. Louis Rams  4-12

They have a chance to end up 4-12, but will probably do a game or so better.


My Title Game picks:

AFC Championship:  Houston (1) def. Denver (2)  30-24

This is still a good pick, and could easily happen.


NFC Championship:  Chicago (2) def. New York (1)  24-21

I guess this matchup could still happen, but it probably would be in New York.


Super Bowl XLVII:  Texans (A1) def. Bears (N2)  27-20

This has a good chance, but since both teams are doing so well, it probably won't happen.



First Half Awards

Most Valuable Player:  JJ Watt, DE, Houston

I think Manning will overtake him eventually, but through the first half of the season, I'll give it to Watt, who has played his position better than anyone I have ever seen. He has 10.5 sacks playing 3-4 DE, which leads the NFL. This is unprecedented really. Add to that his 10 passes defended, which is basically among the tops for D-Backs. He's spearheaded that defense that lost Cushing and hasn't had the same production from Reed and Barwin that they had in 2011. He's brilliant, really.


Offensive Player of the Year: Peyton Manning, QB, Denver

Adrian Peterson and Reggie Wayne have arguments as well, but Peyton has been the best QB in the NFL. I'll remove volume stats because some QBs have played more games (Eli and Rodgers, who lead Peyton in yards and TDs, respectively), but by rate stats, Peyton is tops in completion percentage (69.5%), and yards per attempt (8.2) a tandem which is so rarely done. He is 2nd in TD% (behind Rodgers), 2nd in Yards per Game, tops in passer rating. He's tops in the advanced stats I care about (Football Outsider's DVOA and DYAR), and tops in an advanced stat I care little about (ESPN's Total QB Rating). Add to that the fact that he missed the entire season last year and is playing with new teammates. 


Defensive Player of the Year: JJ Watt, DE, Houston

Just read everything I wrote in the MVP part. Charles Tillman has a good case as well with his recent spate of brilliant play.


Offensive Rookie of the Year: Andrew Luck, QB, Indianapolis

RGIII led this early, and Doug Martin has been on a role recently, but Andrew Luck is the largest reason that the NFL's biggest surprise is 5-3. He's taken a team with no proven weapons after Reggie Wayne, a sad o-line and fungible backs and led them to being a pretty good offenses. Just watching him and you can see that there is something special going on right now in Indianapolis.


Defensive Rookie of the Year: Chandler Jones, DE, New England

Honestly, other than Luke Kuechly who's picked it up recently, and Janoris Jenkins, who started out well, and Bruce Irvin, who's slowed down, there isn't much competition. Chandler Jones has been great from the beginning, and the Patriots have needed it because their pass rush otherwise has regressed a lot from last season after losing dual 10-sack men Anderson and Carter. Jones has been good against the run as well. Bill Belichick traded up in the draft for once, and it worked.


Coach of the Year: Lovie Smith, Chicago

You can make a case for interim coach Bruce Arians, who is 4-1 in his tenure after Pagano left with the Luekemia diagnosis. An interim would be unprecedented. Gary Kubiak has a case as well, but that team is more about defense right now. I'll give it to Lovie Smith. The Bears were 8-8 last season, so this is a step up, and his defense is playing incredible right now.


Executive of the Year: John Elway, Denver

He took a chance on Peyton Manning. He brought in Tamme and Dreessen to help him. After JD Walton went down, he moved quickly and brought in Dan Koppen. He brought in Tracy Porter, who's played decent before he was injured, and Mike Adams, who's played really well. This is a hard one to really guage, but Elway got the biggest fish.

NFL 2012: Week 10 Power Rankings and the Rest

I'll do some midseason review stuff later. Some of my predictions have been quite wrong (Eagles, Chargers), but my pre-Season Super Bowl pick of Chicago vs. Houston is looking quite good. Anyway, let's get to the week that was first.

Looking back at Last Week's Picks

Chargers (-7.5)  over  Chiefs  (CORRECT  =  1-0)
Broncos (-4)  over  Bengals  (CORRECT  =  2-0)
Cardinals (+11)  over  Packers  (WRONG  =  2-1)
Colts (+2.5)  over  Dolphins  (CORRECT  =  3-1)  (UPSET)
Ravens (-3.5)  over  Browns  (CORRECT  =  4-1)
Texans (-10.5)  over  Bills  (CORRECT  =  5-1)
Redskins  (-3.5)  over  Panthers  (WRONG  =  5-2)
Lions (-3.5)  over  Jaguars  (CORRECT  =  6-2)  (LOCK)
Bears (-3)  over  Titans  (CORRECT  =  7-2)
Vikings (+5)  over  Seahawks  (WRONG  =  7-3)
Raiders (-1.5)  over  Buccaneers  (WRONG  =  7-4)
Giants (-3)  over  Steelers  (WRONG  =  7-5)
Falcons (-4)  over  Cowboys  (CORRECT  =  8-5) 
Eagles (+3)  over  Saints  (WRONG  =  8-6)


Week 9: 8-6  (LOCK: 1-0;  UPSET: 1-0)

Year-to-Date: 73-56-3  (LOCK: 7-2; UPSET: 8-1)

Best Picks: If not for the semi-garbage time field goal, I would have gotten the Denver winning 31-20 right (they won 31-23). I also picked the Colts to win 23-17 (they won 23-20). I picked the Packers to beat Arizona 27-17 (they won 31-17), but my pick had the Cards covering, which probably disqualifies it from this section.


Power Rankings


32.) Jacksonville Jaguars  (1-7  =  117-219)

The Good News: They get their annual night game coming up.

The Bad News: They actually have to play these games without MJD and with Blaine Gabbert.


31.) Kansas City Chiefs  (1-7  =  133-240)

The Good News: The get to play on primetime! Again!

The Bad News: They'll probably lose badly on primetime! Again!


30.) Tennessee Titans  (3-6  =  182-308)

The Good News: They have pieces on offense and are capable of scoring 20 every game.

The Bad News: They have nothing on defense and are incapable of giving up less than 20 in any game.


29.) Buffalo Bills  (3-5  =  180-248)

The Good News: Their defense actually had a decent performance against a good offense.

The Bad News: Decent means giving up 111 yards rushing on 24 carries to Arian Foster.


28.) New York Jets  (3-5  =  168-200)

The Good News: They might get Joe McKnight back.

The Bad News: That getting Joe McKnight back was the best news I could come up with.


27.) Cleveland Browns  (2-7  =  169-211)

The Good News: They are competitive every week and their young players are mostly playing well.

The Bad News: They settle for field goals way too much, and are probably going to change GMs, Coaches and possibly schemes even though the core of the team isn't that bad.


26.) Carolina Panthers  (2-6  =  149-180)

The Good News: Cam Newton is still their QB (he is NOT the problem in Carolina) and their defense shows signs of great play.

The Bad News: They are paying gobs of money to two RBs who they refuse to use.


25.) St. Louis Rams  (3-5  =  137-186)

The Good News: They don't have to play Aaron Rogers or Tom Brady anymore, and all their remaining homes games are on this continent.

The Bad News: Their defense has fallen off, their offense still doesn't have enough pieces, and they have to go to San Fran next.


24.) Cincinnati Bengals  (3-5  =  189-218)

The Good News: Andy Dalton to AJ Green/Jermaine Gresham is still something to build around for the future.

The Bad News: The future could have been in 2012, as they started 3-1, but dropping winnable games and then dropping largely unwinnable won't help their cause.


23.) Washington Redskins  (3-6  =  226-248)

The Good News: Their offense is still great on the ground, and RGIII is still very good, and Shanahan has adapted well to pair an offense with RGIII.

The Bad News: They've now fallen out of the playoff race, and Shanahan seems too in love with the offense, being a little too aggressive.


22.) Oakland Raiders  (3-5  =  171-229)

The Good News: Their passing offense continues to be quite good, and Heyward-Bey and Moore are a good tandem if they can stay healthy.

The Bad News: That defense, intentionally, is scorched-earth and just awful, and they are missing an opportunity in an open AFC Wild Card race.


21.) Philadelphia Eagles  (3-5  =  133-183)

The Good News: They might be finally rid of Andy Reid after this season.

The Bad News: Chances are the next coach will not be any better.


20.) Arizona Cardinals  (4-5  =  144-173)
 

The Good News: That defense is still very good and they contest nearly every throw, showing by the fact they held Rodgers to less than 50% completion percentage.

The Bad News: Their o-line is still a mess, and their season has officially gone to hell after a 4-0 start.


19.) New Orleans Saints  (3-5  =  218-229)

The Good News: They saved their season and found some swagger defensively that was missing throughout the year.

The Bad News: Their defense is still atrocious and their schedule is still hard.

*Because all the remaining teams have a realistic shot at the playoffs, I am going to go bad news first, because as a human, I love getting bad news first, and then good news to pick me up.*

 

18.) Minnesota Vikings  (5-4  =  204-197)

The Bad News: Christian Ponder is having too many games with incredibly small yards-per-completion numbers and sub-100 yard passing days.

The Good News: They still employ Adrian Peterson, who is a beast among men.


17.) Dallas Cowboys  (3-5  =  150-181)

The Bad News: They've dropped winnable games and still continue to not score points despite putting up a lot of yards.

The Good News: Have you seen their schedule? They have a string of winnable games, and unless one of the Lions/Vikings/Seahawks group goes on a run they can contend.


16.) Miami Dolphins  (4-4  =  170-149)

The Bad News: They lost a game to another Wild Card competitor and their schedule gets a lot tougher.

The Good News: Ryan Tannehill has been wildly impressive in his time, and has developed a rapport with a mediocre corp of receivers, so imagine him with a good group.


15.) Indianapolis Colts  (5-3  =  159-191)
 

The Bad News: The defense is still not very good and Dwight Freeney is playing so average right now that it is just sad to watch.

The Good News: I would say Andrew Luck, but the better news is that THIS GUY is their head coach (get well soon, Coach Pagano).


14.) San Diego Chargers  (4-4  =  185-157)

The Bad News: Their string of 8 straight seasons with at least 400 points is in jeopardy as they are on pace for 370, and Philip Rivers is still throwing to average players.

The Good News: Their schedule is easy, the competition for a Wild Card spot isn't the best, and Rivers can't stay this bad, can he?


13.) Tampa Bay Buccaneers  (4-4  =  226-185)
 

The Bad News: Their pass defense is still historically awful, and sooner or later, they won't keep getting 6.2 yards per play like they do now.

The Good News: Their rush defense is still very good, and Greg Schiano is shoving it in my face. He's a good coach. I was wrong. But a warning for the Bucs, I wrote almost the same sentence about Josh McDaniels in Denver.


12.) Detroit Lions  (4-4  =  192-188)
 

The Bad News: Their pass rush is still very up-and-down, and Ndamukong Suh continues to underwhelm after an, admittedly, amazing rookie campaign.

The Good News: They are 4-4, and right back in the playoff race, and with Mikel Leshoure healthy, they seem to actually have a running game now.


11.) Seattle Seahawks  (5-4  =  170-154)
 

The Bad News: Their run defense was exposed.

The Good News: Their pass defense rebounded and totally dominated the Vikings, and they still get the best home field crowd in the NFL.


10.) Green Bay Packers  (6-3  =  208-170)
 

The Bad News: Aaron Rodgers continues to be slightly off, hitting just 14 of his 30 throws.

The Good News: Aaron Rodgers continues to be a TD vulture, getting 4 TDs in those 14 throws, and has an Godly 7.8 TD%.


9.) New York Giants  (6-3  =  254-185)

The Bad News: They were thoroughly dominated in their building for the 2nd time, and for the first time in a while, blew a 4th quarter lead in big fashion.

The Good News: They still have control of a weak division and their run game has looked better recently.


8.) Baltimore Ravens  (6-2  =  199-176)

The Bad News: They still don't have Lard Webb or Ray Lewis, and their offense hasn't been able to really pick up the production since.

The Good News: They continue to win, and if they can split with the Steelers could easily still sneak out that division.


7.) Pittsburgh Steelers  (5-3  =  191-164)
 

The Bad News: Mike Adams looks overmatched at guard, and Antonio Brown could be out and they are now on their 25th running back.

The Good News: Their defense, despite not getting many sacks, has been great recently and Ben Roethlisberger is quietly have a great, great season.


6.) New England Patriots  (5-3  =  262-170)

The Bad News: Their pass defense still sucks.

The Good News: They did pick up Aqib Talib, so maybe it will only suck 90% as much now.


5.) Denver Broncos  (5-3  =  235-175)
 

The Bad News: Manning is human, as he threw two picks, including an awful heave for pick #2.

The Good News: Manning still led back-to-back TD drives after that, and the schedule only gets... easier.


4.) Atlanta Falcons  (8-0  =  220-143)
 

The Bad News: Matt Bryant has been off so far this year.

The Good News: There's little pressure for 16-0 so far becuase seemingly no one thinks this is the best team in the NFL anyway, but they are really good.


3.) San Francisco 49ers  (6-2  =  189-103)
 

The Bad News: I don't really know. They might be rusty off the bye?

The Good News: Jim Harbaugh laughs at rust, and Michael Crabtree is finally not playing like a bust on a consistent basis.


2.) Houston Texans  (7-1  =  237-137)
 

The Bad News: Their offense could only muster 21 points against the Bills.

The Good News: They are good enough to still win by double-digits anyway, and they have a chance to redeem themselves on primetime after their last nigh experience against Green Bay.


1.) Chicago Bears  (7-1  =  236-120)

The Bad News: They truly can't keep scoring defensive TDs at this rate.

The Good News: Their offense is good, their defense is special, their special teams is still good, and they have a chance to grab that 'best team in the league' title with games against Houston and San Fran coming up.


Ranking the Upcoming Week's Games

14.) Kansas City Chiefs (1-7)  @  Pittsburgh Steelers (5-3)  (MNF - ESPN)

One of the best by-products of the league making the TNF schedule go the whole season (and there aren't many) was that the quality of MNF games improved because the token awful prime-time games that used to be on MNF could be stashed away. Well, I guess they didn't go through with that for every week. Anyway, this game looks dreadful. Of course, because it is football, I'll watch it anyway.


13.) Tennessee Titans (3-5)  @  Miami Dolphins (4-4)  (1:00 - CBS)

Just ugh. Let's see if the Titans can actually limit a team to less than 30 for once.


12.) St. Louis Rams (3-5)  @  San Francisco 49ers (6-2)  (4:25 - FOX)
11.) Buffalo Bills (3-5)  @  New England Patriots (5-3)  (1:00 - CBS)

Two division games that have serious blowout potential, but I think one of them is at least interesting. The Bills did lead the Pats 21-7 before they forgot how to play football the last time. The Rams need to show up after two straight awful games.


10.) Oakland Raiders (3-5)  @  Baltimore Ravens (6-2)  (1:00 - CBS)
9.) New York Jets (3-5)  @  Seattle Seahawks (5-4)  (4:05 - CBS)
8.) New York Giants (6-3)  @  Cincinnati Bengals (3-5)  (1:00 - FOX)

Three intra-conference games that have some storylines but are mostly boring. The Raiders could give Baltimore a game, but I can see the Ravens coming out in force in their first home game since their stars went down. The Jets get a trip to Seattle, where I'm sure Rex Ryan will wish he had the Seahawks defense, and the Giants look to rebound.


7.) Detroit Lions (4-4)  @  Minnesota Vikings (5-4)  (1:00 - FOX)
6.) Indianapolis Colts (5-3)  @  Jacksonville Jaguars (1-7)  (TNF - NFLN) 

5.) Atlanta Falcons (8-0)  @  New Orleans Saints (3-5)  (1:00 - FOX)
 

Three division games all have implications. The Lions and Vikings are fighting for leading position for that 6th seed, and the Lions are looking to at least split the season series. The Colts always play close games in Jacksonville, and have had some memorable night games there late in the Manning era. The Falcons have another test on their quest to perfection against a team playing for its life.


4.) San Diego Chargers (4-4)  @  Tampa Bay Buccaneers (4-4)  (1:00 - CBS)
3.) Denver Broncos (5-3)  @  Carolina Panthers (2-6)  (1:00 - CBS)

Two intra-conference games are fun for different reasons. Chargers vs. Buccaneers is a game that could really decide which of the two contend in their respective conferences, and gives the Chargers another chance to show some mettle on the road. The Broncos get to visit a renewed Carolina team, Manning's chance to stick it to Jerry Richardson, who apparently belittled him last year during the lockout.


2.) Dallas Cowboys (3-5)  @  Philadelphia Eagles (3-5)  (4:25 - FOX)

The #6 seed race in the NFC has become swamped in mediocrity much like the AFC state (of course, the teams vying for the NFC spot just 'feel' better, don't they?). This is kind of an elimination game here. The Eagles have had a lot of success recently against the Cowboys after going 0-3 in 2009. Vick, in fact, has yet to lose to the Cowboys. Should be a good game.


1.) Houston Texans (7-1)  @  Chicago Bears (7-1)  (SNF - NBC)

My Super Bowl pick before the year might actually be a Super Bowl preview in this matchup. Anyway, this should be an awesome game. I can already see Jay Cutler running for his life, and I can also see the Texans offense struggling. Soldier Field should be in great form at night as well. Can't Wait for this one. (BTW, the Bears have another playoff position game next week in a trip to San Francisco next Monday Night)


Postseason Projections (More details in Midseason Review)

AFC

1.) Houston Texans (13-3)
2.) Denver Broncos (12-4)
3.) Pittsburgh Steelers (12-4)
4.) New England Patriots (11-5)
5.) Baltimore Ravens (11-5)
6.) Indianapolis Colts (9-7)


NFC

1.) Atlanta Falcons (14-2)
2.) Chicago Bears (13-3)
3.) San Francisco 49ers (12-4)
4.) New York Giants (11-5)
5.) Green Bay Packers (11-5)
6.) Seattle Seahawks (9-7)

Thursday, November 1, 2012

NBA Preview

Only Regular Season right now. I actually did the work to make the standings add up correctly.

Eastern Conference

Atlantic Division

1.) Boston Celtics  -  54-28 (2)

I still like the depth here with Bradley back, with Green back, with Sulinger in the mix, and with Rondo. Plus, I think they are pissed that they lost Allen.


2.) Brooklyn Nets  -  46-36 (6)

Good team, but I think they are getting slightly overhyped. I do like the acquisitions of Joe Johnson (who won't have to be the star here), the return of Lopez, and the rest of that team.


3.) New York Knicks  -  44-38 (7)

The injuries to Stoudamire hurts, as does losing Shumpurt for the season. I think Melo is a great player, but that isn't what he signed up for. Tough luck, but at least they'll still be in the playoffs.


4.) Philadelphia 76ers  -  39-43  (8)

Not a huge fan of the Bynum deal for their perspective, or of letting Lou Williams go. They seem like an odd team that could easily be less than the sum of their parts.


5.) Toronto Raptors  -  35-47

I like the Raptors. I have little to say about these bad teams, so I won't try.


Central Division

1.) Indiana Pacers  -  50-32  (3)

I think they peaked last season, really. Roy Hibbert is a nice player, but I don't like the foundation of their team, and still don't think they have an go-to scorer in close games.


2.) Chicago Bulls  -  47-35  (5)

I don't think they are suddenly an average team without Rose. They were fine without Rose for much of last year, and they have lost some of their 2nd team, but I think in a more top-heavy East, and with one of the best coaches, they'll be fine.


3.) Milwaukee Bucks  -  35-47

Not a fan of pairing Brandon Jennings and Monta Ellis.


4.) Detroit Pistons  -  30-52

Not a fan of this team in general, especially I don't think Greg Monroe can be a franchise type player.


5.) Cleveland Cavaliers  -  26-56

Someone has to lose a lot of games.


Southeast Division

1.) Miami Heat  - 63-19  (1)

The domination continues. They have the deepest team of their run yet, and barring injury are the clear #1 seed in the East.


2.) Atlanta Hawks  -  50-32  (4)

They'll get a boost with the dregs that make up the rest of the division. The Hawks still have a good nucleus, with a healthy Horford returning to the fold.


3.) Washington Wizards  -  31-51

The Bottom of...


4.) Orlando Magic  -  23-59

Is so incredilby....


5.) Charlotte Bobcats  -  18-64

Pathetic it is Scary.


Western Conference


Midwest Division

1.) San Antonio Spurs  -  59-23  (1)

They still have the most scarily effective regular season setups I've seen, and with some improvement from Kwahi Leonard and Tiago Splitter offsetting any decline from their Big 3, they should be fine.


2.) Memphis Grizzlies  -  50-32  (5)

They still have the pieces to be a really tough out. I think Zach Randolph won't rebound too much but they are good enough to win 50, again.


3.) Houston Rockets  -  44-38  (7)

That trade for Harden really helps them. They have the talent to make it back to the playoffs. I just hope that Daryl Morey didn't 'shoot his wad' on Harden. There have to be other moves?


4.) Dallas Mavericks  -  39-43

I don't like the Kaman addition, and while Darren Collison is a nice player, I think that they will miss Jason Terry. Dirk's injury woes are a little precarious as well.


5.) New Orleans Hornets  -  24-58

The future is the real concern for the Hornets as they build around Davis.


Northwest Division

1.) Oklahoma City Thunder  -  57-25  (2)

Losing Harden hurts. It really cripples their chances in 2012-13, but this wasn't a move for 2012-13 at all, really. I do like Kevin Martin, but no way is he anything close to Harden.


2.) Denver Nuggets  -  53-29  (4)

I like this as a regular season team. They have so much depth, which is more important in the regular season. I'm just a little nervous about how Andre Iguadala will fit in.


3.) Minnesota Timberwolves  -  43-39  (8)

I think the T'Wolves make that little jump and make the playoffs. Hopefully Rubio is back soon, but they have a lot of depth as it is.


4.) Utah Jazz  -  39-43

Not a huge fan of another team that, to me, seems less than the sum of their parts.


5.) Portland Trail Blazers  -  34-48

It is amazing the Blazers were seen as a model franchise as recently as five years ago. They probably would've been had they just picked Durant and not Oden.


Pacific Division

1.) Los Angeles Lakers  -  56-26  (3)

I don't know how they will all mesh. Dwight Howard is obviously a huge signing, but Kobe showed signs of slippage last season, and Steve Nash is quite old. Anyway, they are good, and they'll be better in the playoffs.


2.) Los Angeles Clippers  -  48-34  (6)

Still have Paul/Griffin but I don't think they can challenge the top teams in the conference. They were woefully outmatched by San Antonio last May, and that was no fluke.


3.) Golden State Warriors  -  35-47

The Bottom of this....


4.) Phoenix Suns  -  34-48

Division is so utterly...


5.) Sacremento Kings  -  24-58

Mediocre it is just Sad.




2.) Denver Nuggets  -  53-29  (4)

Not sure if Andre Iguadala will work or not, but they are so deep. They are a perfect regular season team when depth matters so much more.

Their S**T Does Work in the Playoffs



There's a famous Billy Beane quote near the end of moneyball, where he says that "My s**t doesn't work in the playoffs", trying to justify, after a brilliant 103-59 season, how the A's lost to the Minnesota Twins in the ALDS. Well, for Brian Sabean, a GM often derided as an old-school fool by Sabermetrics, his S**T does indeed work in the playoffs. Six straight playoff series wins; Two World Series' Titles in the past three years. The Giants were long-dormant after their tragic '02 World Series loss, but they are now the model organization in baseball (along with the Rangers and Rays). The ost incredible part: only one of their eight position players were the same in the 2010 and 2012 Teams: Buster Posey.

To me, that is the most incredible part (the other is that they were legitimately very good teams in those seasons, unlike the Cardinals of '06 and '11). Andres Torres replaced by the (better) Angel Pagan. Aubrey Huff replaced by Pablo Sandoval (who was a backup in 2010). Edgar Renterria replaced by the great defense of Brandon Crawford. Juan Uribe replaced by Marco Scutaro. Whoever played right replaced by Hunter Pence. They aren't a great team, but they fit together. The Giants in 2010 and 2012 just worked. 2010 was a dominant postseason run, winning in four, six and five, against two great teams (Phillies and Rangers). This team was different, needing to overcome 0-2 and 1-3 defecits, but they not only did it, but dominated the late stages of those series. How good was their last seven games: they outscored the Cardinals and Tigers

Of course, saying that they nearly completely changed their lineup hides the fact that they kept their pitching largely the same. Of course, the Giants most reputed pitcher in 2010 was Tim Lincecum, who threw a complete game two-hit shutout with 15 K's in Game 1 of the 2010 NLDS. Tim Lincecum in 2012 was a disaster, with the worst ERA of any qualifying pitcher, but found a new life as a brilliant relief pitcher. But Matt Cain and Madison Bumgarner were the same. Sergio Romo moved from elite set-up guy in 2010 to lock-down closer in 2012. The pitching was still the key, and they were so dominant in the postseason. As bad as the Yankees were in the NLCS, the Tigers in the World Series were almost definitely WORSE. That's how good the Giants pitching was, with even Barry Zito pitching in.

Barry Zito, actually, is probably the largest example of the perceived failures of the Brian Sabean era. Everyone, and I mean everyone, new that Barry Zito's 7-year 126 Million contract was horrible. And it most certainly was. But Barry Zito was brilliant in the playoffs, pitching 8 innings of shutout ball in Game 5 of the NLCS as the Giants tried to stave off elimination, and then came back to pitch almost as well in Game 1 of the World Series. Does this suddenly make Sabean's awful contract good? No. But who cares, really. Sabean's real job was the lead the Giants to assembling a roster capable of winning a World Series, and bad contracts and all, he's done that. He, much like Kenny Williams in Chicago, hasn't been afriad to make moves. The fact that the Giants lineup has changed so much since 2010 is an example of that. Last year, with the team clinging to postseason hopes, he traded top prospect Zack Wheeler to the Mets to rent Carlos Beltran for a half a year. It didn't work, but he definitely tried. That's all Sabean's done, and twice in the last three years, he was successful. The Giants were successful.

I love watching games in AT&T Park right now. That place was always beautiful, but cheapened by their whole "loving Barry Bonds" thing. Anyway, with the Bonds era in the rear-view mirror, they become the greatest game-day atmosphere in baseball. When the Giants clinched the NLCS in a monsoon, was it even a question that seemingly not one person would leave that stadium before the celebration was over? Of course not. That city, that crowd, loves their team, and why wouldn't they? The Giants, even despite harboring Barry Bonds, the pariah of the Steroid Era, took a hard stance with Melky Cabrera, a decision that would have been scrutinized much more if Cincinnati just finished the Giants off.

The Giants are still set up great going forward, especially if Lincecum can regain anything close to even his 2010-11 form. They have the best young catcher in baseball in Buster Posey. They have a newly committed and dangerous Pablo Sandoval. They have a player who could become a lot better in Brandon Belt, and they have that pitching, that beautiful pitching. Anyway, the Giants, much like their football counterpart, are something special right now, and all because their maligned GM takes chances, but also decided to draft a heck of a lot of good players.

About Me

I am a man who will go by the moniker dmstorm22, or StormyD, but not really StormyD. I'll talk about sports, mainly football, sometimes TV, sometimes other random things, sometimes even bring out some lists (a lot, lot, lot of lists). Enjoy.