Monday, April 9, 2012

Who's a Bust: Future Hall of Famer's Pt. 2

Continuing my projection of what current NFL player will get into the HOF, and how likely they will get there, here is the defense.

Quick reminder, the Tiers are basically barometers of where they are in their careers in relation to the HOF. The 1st-Tier is for guys that are slam-dunk 1st ballot HOFers. These guys are all the best in their position over a long period of time (think Bruce Smith, Ronnie Lott). The 2nd Tier is for guys who have been in the league long enough that if they retire today (or in the next couple of years with similar production) are likely HOFers, but probably guys that wouldn't be first-ballot (think Chris Doleman, eventually Michael Strahan). The 3rd Tier is for guys that are about 3-7 seasons into their career and have a chance if they continue at their current pace for another 5+ years. The 4th Tier is for players in years 1-3 of their career who started out great and could get there.


4-3 DE/3-4 OLB


1st Tier: Nobody


2nd Tier: Dwight Freeney (Colts), Jared Allen (Chiefs, Vikings), and Julius Peppers (Panthers, Bears)





These have been the best three DEs in the NFL over the past 7 years. It might be a racial thing, but the common idea is Jared Allen has a great motor and never gives up on plays, while Freeney doesn't play the run well and Julius Peppers takes games off. Anyway, none of that is totally true, but I think people expect more from Freeney and Peppers. Peppers was criticized all the time for taking games off, for not being dominant enough. Well, save for one lousy season, Peppers has been money. Freeney is better against the run than most thing. Allen is arguably the best of the three. They all have over 100 sacks and many pro bowls and all-pro's (7/3 for Freeney, 4/4 for Allen and 6/3 for Peppers). Usually, 130 sacks is a minimum, and they should all get there in their careers (105 for Allen, 102.5 for Freeney and 100 for Peppers and their ages are 30, 32 and 32 respectively). Pass rushers age well so they should at least have three to four more productive years. The consistency of all three is astounding, and they should all find their way to Canton.


3rd Tier: Nobody



4th Tier: Jason Pierre-Paul (Giants)


It might be a little of a stretch to project someone after just two seasons, but hell if I've seen a more raw-talented DE as Pierre-Paul. He still doesn't have the technique and experience that he will have as he gets older, and can learn from two good DEs (Justin Tuck and Osi). Pierre-Paul already has a first-team all-pro nod, and a 16.5 sack season. At just 23, he has at least another 10 years (if healthy) of great production to come. Jason Pierre-Paul also has other features apart from just sacks that aren't as important in a statistical sense, but help with the story. He's great at batting down husbands and even blocking field goals. Jason Pierre-Paul has a good team around him, and should continue to stay in the spot-light.



3-4 DL/4-3 DT


1st Tier: Nobody


2nd Tier: Vince Wilfork (Patriots), Richard Seymour (Patriots, Raiders), Kevin Williams (Vikings)



 


Vince Wilfork is just 31, although it feels like he's been around forever. He's been the centerpiece of the defense of the winningest franchise during his career. What separates him from the other old Patriots defensive stalwarts (Law, Bruschi, Vrabel, McGinest - Law probably is the only one with a chance) is that he's the link between that defense and the current defense. He's been one of the best NT for years now. He's never been a first-team all-pro, but four times been voted to the 2nd team. Seymour was Bill Belichick's first draft pick in 2001, and he was the best defensive player for a defensive-based team that won three Super Bowls. He's continued his success in Oakland, going to two more pro-bowls, including 15 more sacks at DT. Seymour's been the best 3-4 DE in the NFL at one point, and a close to dominant 4-3 DT. The 7 pro-bowls and 3 all-pro selections are more proof of his valued contribution. As for Kevin Williams, he just might be the most underrated defensive lineman over the past 10 years in terms of his historical standing. Kevin Williams has been selected to the all-pro team 5 times. He's missed just 4 games in his career, and got 54.5 career sacks playing all of his snaps inside. He's not Warren Sapp, but he's the best 4-3 DT since Sapp retired. At least one half of the most dominant pairs of DTs of the last decade should be in the Hall of Fame.


3rd Tier: Haloti Ngata (Ravens)


He's the most unblockable force in the NFL right now, the best 3-4 DE over the past five years (taking that mantle from Seymour) and he's possibly getting better. He's been named all-pro each of the last two years (2nd team the two years before that), with at least 5 sacks in each year. He gets double-teamed constantly and still gets pressure up the gut. Ngata is now the most important player of a defensive dynasty in Baltimore, and he's playing it well. Haloti never gets hurt, and is amazingly only just 28 years old. He still has five years of quality production left in him.


4th Tier: Ndamukong Suh (Lions)


It is hard to deny that Ndamukong Suh did not have the same impact as a second year player as he did in his historically good rookie campaign (led the NFL in sacks for a tackle with 10). I think his rookie form is closer to his real production. Ndamukong was still a matchup nightmare. All it was is that he didn't get to the quarterback. Guards have learned his basic move and strength, but as Suh adapts and grows as a talent, he should only get better. The fact that he plays for a team that is going to be good for a long time with Stafford and Johnson, so Suh should get a lot of exposure.


3-4 OLB


1st Tier: Nobody


2nd Tier: DeMarcus Ware (Cowboys)


DeMarcus Ware could produce at a pace half of his current one for the next five years and still make the Hall of Fame. There has not been a more dominant pass-rusher since Ware entered the league. 99.5 sacks in seven seasons (112 games). DeMarcus has never missed a game, and he's only once not recorded double digit sacks, and that was his rookie season. Six pro-bowls and four all-pro nods later (including seasons of 14.0, 20.0, 15.5 and 19.5 sacks) he's undoubtedly the best edge pass-rusher year after year in the NFL. Somehow he's never won Defensive Player of the Year (losing to James Harrison and Terrell Suggs in his 20 and 19.5 sack seasons) but that won't keep him out of the HOF.


3rd Tier: Terrell Suggs (Ravens), LaMarr Woodley (Steelers)



Quick note about the guy that is not on the list. James Harrison has had five great seasons (2007-2011) but his late start will kill his chances of putting up the career numbers necessary to get included. The two other great AFC North pass rushers have better chances. Suggs is closer, since he has had more consistent production, going to four more pro bowls (5 to 1) than Woodley and being just two years older. Suggs will finally be 30 next season, and already has 82.5 sacks and has had his best two seasons over the past two years. He's playing like he is just in his prime. Woodley is 28, so he has more time. This is a more tenuous prediction, but if he stayed healthy in 2011, he would have four straight double-digit sack seasons. The one-pro bowl is little, but I think he might be starting a string of them. There's a reason why the AFC North has such great defenses and these two are a large reason why.


4th Tier: Aldon Smith (49ers), Clay Matthews (Packers)



Now I'm getting ridiculous, predicting a rookie to get into the HOF, but Aldon Smith was special. He has an unending motor and is a player who will only get better on one of the best d-lines in football. 14 sacks as a rookie is a great start. The most special part of Aldon Smith's season was that he got better as the year went on. Clay Matthews had his first average year, with just 6.0 sacks (he did drop into coverage more, with three interceptions along the way) but still got another pro-bowl selection. Those are important in a way. If you can just rack up pro-bowl after pro-bowl, it might outweigh having stats that aren't worthy. Another thing for Clay is that his family ties with HOF Uncle Bruce might get him pushed in.


4-3 LB/3-4 ILB


1st Tier: Ray Lewis (Ravens)



He was the second highest ranking active player on the NFL Networks Top 100 Greatest Players of All Time countdown before the 2010 season, ranking at #18 (the only active player ranked higher was that guy that wears #18). It probably is safe to say that his actual production and his perceived ability are finally meshed. No one really thinks of him as a truly great player currently, but still definitely an effective one. That said, a 13-time pro-bowler and 7-time All-Pro, with two Defensive Player of the Year awards (2000, 2003) probably doesn't need to prove anything anymore.


2nd Tier: Patrick Willis (49ers), Brian Urlacher (Bears), Lance Briggs (Bears)






I'll start with Willis who is the 2nd youngest Tier 2 player in my projections  (a couple months older than Adrian Peterson). Do I honestly think that if he retires today he gets in? No, but I think other than the two people also in this tier, and Ray Lewis, he has the best case. At 27, he's already made four first-team All-Pro teams, and with nods each of the past three years, he's entrenched on that squad. With the 49ers finally getting good again, his exposure will only rise. As for the two Bears, I struggled with putting both on the list because having two teammates at the same position be HOF worthy seems like a stretch, but they really both have cases, especially Urlacher. Brian has the nods (8/4 pro-bowl/all-pro) as well as universal praise of being the best 4-3 MLB since Derrick Brooks. His selection to the All-Decade team makes him almost a shoo-in (as I said in the offense section, those guys almost always get in). He was the centerpiece of the NFC's best defense year-in, year-out of the 2000s. Lance Briggs will probably need many more years on the ballot than Urlacher will. Lance Briggs has a couple of things going for him. He's a pro-bowl player every year and he is known as the best 4-3 LB in pass coverage. He rarely misses games, and Briggs is only 31. Linebackers (especially ones that aren't 3-4 OLBs) have good age curves and can play pretty well into the mid-30's. I think Briggs definitely will be in the discussion come 2020.


3rd Tier: Nobody


4th Tier: Von Miller (Broncos)


It is hard to remember that Von Miller is neither a 4-3 DE or 3-4 OLB even though he was a pass-rush beast at times as a rookie. Until he hurt his wrist late in the year, Von Miller was the favorite for Defensive Rookie of the Year. He was picked for the 2nd team all-pro, which is important going forward because he can get into that 1st team club as early as next year. Von Miller will be interesting to watch going forward to see if he still rushes as much as he did last year from a 4-3 OLB position. Those guys aren't always consistent, but I think Von Miller will be special. Pass rushers do well in defenses paired with Manning offenses.


CB


1st Tier: Champ Bailey (Redskins, Broncos)



It is hard to remember just how good Champ Bailey was at times in the mid-2000s. He was for a 5-year stretch the best corner every year. With 11 pro-bowl selections in 13 seasons, Bailey has been among the best in the NFL in both conferences. Champ Bailey's 50 career interceptions, memorable playoff moment (which probably shouldn't matter, but definitely does) with his pick off of Brady. He has the 1st team All-Decade nod. Everything in the checklist is there. The only black mark I can think of is that Bailey was traded straight-up for Clinton Portis.


2nd Tier: Charles Woodson (Raiders, Packesr), Asante Samuel (Patriots, Eagles), Ronde Barber (Buccaneers), Nnamdi Asomugha (Raiders, Eagles)







In an era that is getting increasingly pass-heavy, corners are more important than ever, and I think that increased spotlight will in-turn increase the chances of more corners getting into the HOF. These four are all guys who at some moment were either the best or second best corner in the NFL. Woodson is an interesting case because I think his success in Green Bay has made people completely forget that when he left Oakland, he had an underwhelming career to date. That said, it is hard to point out that he left Oakland in their last semi-decent year (2005 - a lot better than the 2006-2009 Raiders) and then joined Green Bay who's defense immediately took off (there are other factors). He has the ring, the Defensive Player of the Year, three all-pro's, a 2nd team all-decade selection and 54 interceptions and counting. Al Davis can still draft corners. Somehow, Asante Samuel only has one first team all-pro selection, but I think that resume, heavily built on playoff moments, is good enough. Asante Samuel has four career pick-6's in the playoffs, which is the most all time. He has 9 career interceptions in the playoffs (tied with Ed Reed for most active). An underrated aspect of Asante's career is he is arguably better (at least in advanced stats - check out his numbers at Football Outsiders) as an Eagle. Corners also age well, so Asante still has time to get his resume more focused. Ronde Barber's consistency and longevity is absolutely astounding. 15 seasons. He missed 15 games in his rookie season, and missed exactly zero since. Other than 10 picks in 2001, he has between 2-5 in all but one season. That said, a 2nd team all-decade and 3 all-pro selections are good. As is his spot as one of the defensive stalwarts of the best defense in the early-2000s. Also, he has been a good citizen, and it would just be fun to see Ronde get in the HOF, after Tiki's arguable HOF-trending career ended because he retired for a definitely not HOF career as a reporter. As for Nnamdi, he will be a great litmus test to see if reputation can truly counter lack of counting stats. People know Nnamdi, from 2006-2010 was the best corner in the NFL (or at least second). People know no one threw at Nnamdi. However, after QBs learned that after 8 picks in 2006, Nnamdi has just 6 interceptions over the past five seasons. Nnamdi has the accolades with the all-pro nods, but I don't know if his career will just be flashy enough for him to get in.


3rd Tier: Darrelle Revis (Jets)


Darrelle Revis was close, for me, to going into Tier-2 like his 2007 draftmates Peterson and Willis, but I think there has been a slight down-tick in Revis love in 2011. There is no denying that in 2009, Darrelle Revis might have had the best season a corner has ever had, but many corners have one great year (Cortland Finnegan, for instance, was incredible in 2008). Revis does have three-straight first-team all-pro nods, so there is a legacy there, but I don't know where the career is going. If he continues what he has done over the past two seasons even (after the insane 2009) for four or five more years, he is in though.


4th Tier: Patrick Peterson (Cardinals)


I have no idea what my thinking is here. I don't really know if Peterson is any good as a corner. I do know, however, that Peterson is a great return man. For whatever reason, I think Peterson will become the great corner everyone thought he would become coming out of LSU. Peterson has boat-loads of talent. This has a chance to be my most wrong selection, but Tier-4 is the place for those fun picks.


S

1st Tier: Ed Reed (Ravens)



Ed Reed is the best safety I have ever seen. I have never understood the Ed Reed vs. Troy Polamalu argument because although they are safeties, when the argument really heated up (2008) they didn't play the same position. However, Ed Reed used to play SS. From 2002-2005, Ed Reed was a SS, and he was the best in the league at that position. He switched to FS in 2006, and guess what? Reed was the best in the league at that position too (I always think he should have won Defensive Player of the Year in 2008 over James Harrison - 9 picks, 3 fumble returns, 3 TDs). Ed Reed has 5 all-pros. He's led the league in interceptions three times (2004, 2008, 2010) including in a year he played just 10 games. Reed has 9 playoff interceptions in 11 games. Ed Reed is the best safety I have ever seen. He might be, after Ray Lewis, the biggest lock of any active player to be a 1st-ballot guy.


2nd Tier: Troy Polamalu (Steelers), Brian Dawkins (Eagles, Broncos)





Just like corners, safeties have become more prominent in the 2000s with the pass-heavy offenses in the NFL. Polamalu's only thing on Ed Reed is the rings. He's not Ed Reed. I doubt he's first ballot, but Polamalu is definitely a HOFer. Four 1st-team all-pro nods, as well as a 2010 Defensive Player of the Year. Polamalu's brilliance is probably better represented with anectodes and accolades than stats, but it definitely is worthy. Brian Dawkins tenure in Denver has been surprisingly good, but even without that three-year stint, he will be in. The longevity at that position is astounding. With 4 first-team all-pro nods and a 1st team all-decade. Dawkins ability as an all-around safety is in reality Polamalu-esque, with 37 career interceptions and 36 career forced fumbles as well as 26 sacks. Polamalu will never catch Dawkins in sacks or forced fumbles.


3rd Tier:  Nick Collins (Packers)


Collins is probably a long shot, but he's on a better track than anyone else (not named those three above him, obviously). Collins doesn't have any 1st-team all-pro selections, but three 2nd-teams. If he comes back healthy, he could still have about five good years left, and maybe more if he has a Sharper-type late career. The 21 interceptions aren't a lot, but again, even averaging 5 over the next five years gives him 46 career, which is in line with other HOF safeties. Collins also gets the benefit of playing on a great team which will be competing for years.


4th Tier: Earl Thomas (Seahawks)


For a guy who will just be 23 in 2012, Earl Thomas is a star. Already a pro-bowler in 2011 (and in a conference lacking a lot of competition at safety), Thomas should be a fixture on that team for years. The Seahawks are a team on the rise, so his exposure should improve. He gets interceptions and plays good coverage. Thomas has a chance. Like any Tier-4 person, there is a chance injury plays a factor, but I think Thomas, if healthy, can get there.


Coaches


1st Tier: Bill Belichick (Patriots)


I don't want to really talk about how great of a coach Bill Belichick is (not that great of a GM, but coach? amazing). I don't think I need to. Unless there is some black-balling because of Spygate, Belichick is about as good of a 1st-ballot candidate as any coach since Bill Walsh or Joe Gibbs.


2nd Tier: Tom Coughlin (Giants), Mike Shanahan (Broncos, Redskins)



It is very interesting to contrast these two. Both have coached multiple teams. Shanahan's run in Washington hasn't been truly long enough to analyze, but a lot of it rests on RG3's success. Anyway, their careers records are close (Coughlin is 142-114 (.556) while Shanahan is 157-119 (.569)). Both have won their only two Super Bowl appearances, including memorable runs (the '98 Broncos were dominant but the '97 team was a wild-card team). Coughlin has had more success with his 'other' team (his 68-60 record with the Jags is great, moreso since they were an expansion team) as he made the AFC Title Game twice with the Jaguars, while Shanahan has yet to make the playoffs outside of Denver, but Shanahan's record with the main team is more impressive. Either way, other than Tom Flores, George Seifert and Jimmy Johnson, every coach with multiple rings is in, and these two will probably go in as well. They have the longevity and consistency that those three exceptions didn't have (though I maintain that Seifert should be in). One last similarity, they both are known for having faces that get really, really red.


3rd Tier: Mike Tomlin (Steelers)


Mike Tomlin has now finished five years as the Steelers coach, and what a five years it was. 55-25 record (three seasons of 12 wins), and two trips to the Super Bowl and one title. If his next five is even slightly worse than the first five (say 50-30 record with one Super Bowl appearance, but winning that one trip) he probably has the resume to get in. Tomlin does coach for an all-time franchise which helps, and one that is run so well it is hard to see Tomlin's Steelers teams ever having a multi-year run of mediocrity. I guess it could happen post-Roethlibserger, but by that time, Tomlin may already have the requisite success to get in.



4th Tier: Jim Harbuagh (49ers)


The list of coaches to have 13-3 records or better in their first season is a list three-names long: George Seifert, Jim Caldwell and Jim Harbaugh. Odd list overall. The other two both inherited great teams with great QBs. Seifert had just absurd success in San Francisco (98-30 in his tenure in San Fran - I do believe if his final season in Carolina was 6-10 instead of 1-15, or if Roger Craig doesn;t fumble that carry late in the 1990 NFC Title Game, Seifert is in the HOF). Caldwell flamed-out epically in Indy. I think Harbaugh has a chance to be the first of the three to get to the HOF. That team is loaded. My only quibble is with the QB, who I don't know will ever get good enough to win a Super Bowl, but Harbaugh had just an amazing year, and unlike Seifert and Caldwell, didn't have a HOF QB running the show. I like him, and I think he will be the second 49er head coach (and 3rd deserving) to get to Canton.

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

2012 MLB Predictions: The AL

I didn't have a lot of time to do a more thorough preview of the MLB season that technically started last week in Japania, but is starting earnestly tonight (and in reality, tomorrow) with the defending World Champion St. Louis Cardinals going to the Miami Marlins and their new ball-park. Anyway, the biggest headlines this upcoming season are probably limited to two:

1.) The AL is loaded. The top four in teh AL East will probably all finish over .500, and the top three have a shot at winning 90 games. The top two in the AL West might be the two best teams in baseball.

2.) There are two wild cards. This makes predicting the playoffs a lot more fun, and makes the playoffs even that much more of a, no pun intended, wildcard. The playoffs can go anywhere with two teams playing one game to enter the real playoffs after playing 162.

Anyway, let's get to the predictions. I've decided to add predictions of wins as well. Hopefully this goes better than my predictions for last year, which other than the Brewers making the ALCS, I got almost completely wrong (I picked the Chicago White Sox to win the World Series, which is about as embarrassing as it gets). The AL is up first.



AL East


1.) Tampa Bay Rays - 97-65 (1)


I think they are loaded. This might be the best iteration of the Rays over the last five years. Their pitching staff is as deep as ever, and their top guys are dead-set in their prime now, with James Shields and David Price leading it. If Matt Moore is close to what people think he will be in 2012, the Rays have six legit starters (those three, and Wade Davis, Jeremy Hellickson and Jeff Neimann). That is a real six-deep rotation (unlike the Red Sox last year). Their ages: 30, 26, 24, 22, 26, 29 Their ERA+: 132, 107, 127, 134, 94, 92. Their line-up is good but not great, but I think there is a chance they really come on this year. Evan Longoria is healthy, and could really take his game to the next level. BJ Upton is somehow now underrated (as in he is what he is, and what he is, is still tremendously valuable) and the fact that he is in a contract year could push his numbers up. Overall, I really like where this team is at.



2.) New York Yankees - 93-69 (5)



It's not that I see the Yankees as really falling off, but I don't like the fact that their hitters are all a year older (in particular, Jeter, A-Rod and Teixeira). A-Rod's elongated path towards old age is well documented, but as a refresher here's his OPS+ over the past five years in order: 176-150-138-123-116. However, what is a little more unreported is Teixeira's drop over the past four years: 152-141-124-117. Granderson probably won't have that great of a year again. That said, I can see Robby Cano having a bounce-back year and I loved the pickup of Hiroki Kuroda (a criminally underrated player). CC Sabathia's second half of 2011 scares me, but they have depth of average and/or young pitching, which is all they need. Plus, the Yankees have one of the best bull-pens with Robertson and Boone Logan, and Mariano Rivera, who will undoubtedly have sub-2.00 ERA's until 2015.



3.) Boston Red Sox - 90-72



I love the line-up in theory. Adrian Gonzalez is awesome. There is some concern over his power drop over the 2nd half, but supposedly it was injury related and now he is healthy. Dustin Pedroia had a really nice year. David Ortiz will probably fall off (hard to keep up the trend of 101-134-151 OPS over the past three years) as he gets older. I think Carl Crawford almost assuredly playing better is offset by Jacoby Ellsbury almost assuredly not having that power year again. I think it is safe to look at Ellsbury's 2011 like Mauer's 2009 in terms of power. I'll wait to see him repeat it before I think it is lasting. What really sets me off about the Red Sox is they did nothing to fix their pitching. Beckett-Lester-Buchholz is a nice top-three, but if one of those gets hurt (pretty likely) there is no depth. Their 4th starter right now is Doubrount, and their fifth is a converted closer. That won't get it done in a deep division.



4.) Toronto Blue Jays - 84-78



I give them one more season before they pass the Red Sox (and a couple more until they pass the Yankees). Their pitching is still filled with young arms. I like Brandon Morrow to have a break-out season. His peripherals are all much better than his ERA (K/9, K/BB, WHIP) and he could easily have a great year. Ricky Romero is a very good pitcher who could get even better. The Jays have a good bullpen with Santos, Casey Jannsen and others. Their hitting is good and could be great. Jose Bautista is the best hitter in the AL over the past two seasons. Brett Lawrie is a future star. Colby Rasmus will finally get to play every day since he's been freed from the shackles of LaRussa. I think they are well positioned in the future, and should straddle .500 once again.



5.) Baltimore Orioles -70-92



One more win! Progress! In reality, the Orioles could be quite a bit better than last year and not see that reflected in their w-l given the strength of their division and the AL in general. Their pitching is still mostly awful, but reports are that Brian Matusz's velocity is back, and that probably equates to him being considerably better than one of the worst starters in baseball. Their line-up is decent, with six regulars with OPSes above 100. Vlad will probably decline out of that group, but the rest (Hardy, Weiters, Jones, Reynolds, Markakis) are all steady. Weiters could continue to break out and fulfill all that promise and hype. Help is on the way, though, with Dylan Bundy and Manny Machado a year away.


AL Central

1.) Detroit Tigers - 93-69


The best team in the AL Central outperformed its expectation last year in terms of their pythagoreon record. It added Fielder, but lost V-Mart, which given V-Marts numbers last year and Fielder switching to the AL, could be closer to a wash than most people think. The key with the Tigers is that they had a lot of people have career years in 2011 that would be hard to match. Obviously, there is Verlander. I have no doubt he's great, but chances are he won't be 24-5 with a 2.40 ERA and a 170 ERA+ over 250 innings again. Their bull-pen was filled with guys that had career years, like Jose Valverde (chances he blows zero saves again are less than zero) and Jaquin Benoit. Their depth in the rotation is an issue as well, as Fister won't repeat his numbers with the Tigers and the rest aren't all that great. That all said, most of that explanation was to convince you why they won't win 100 games. The Tigers are in the worst division in the AL, and should cruise to the division title.


2.) Cleveland Indians - 77-85



I think teams 2-4 will all be interchangeable, but overall I like the Indians. I don't know if their peak with the current crew is that much higher (unlike the team next) but I think it is a safe bet they get just short of .500. Ubaldo should be better with a full year in Cleveland than the numbers he put up in his time there in 2011, and Justin Masterson is a nice complement. Their lineup features four good hitters. Hafner's resurgence over the past three years is nice, but he's about at the age where a decline could come quickly. Carlos Santana is a future star and could get better, and the Indians will also get the luxury of most likely more than half a season from Shin-Soo Choo. Jason Kipnis could be a surprise with a full-time role. Finally, I like the Derek Lowe signing. I don't think they've improved from last year's already inflated record of 80-82, but I don't see a harsh fall back to reality.


3.) Kansas City Royals - 77-85



They can sure hit. Alex Gordon is finally doing something. He might have had the quietest breakout season ever. One could look at it as a fluke, but with someone who always had talent, it probably is just a representation of his peak. He probably won't get too much better than his 2011 given that Gordon is already 28, but I don't see a return to his injury-plagued form of 2009-2010. Billy Butler has been consistently very good over the past three seasons, and still young at 26, he could get better. Miek Moustakas, I feel, was rushed to the majors but with more time probably will improve. Finally, there is Eric Hosmer. A 118 OPS+ (.293/.334/.465) slash as a 21-year old ain't too bad. He's the star of the group. Wil Myers might get called up at sometime, and that is intriguing. Their pitching simply isn't worth talking about.


4.) Chicago White Sox - 75-87



My awful pick for the 2011 World Series slots in at number four with the team doing worse than last year. The offense has a lot of guys that are in the "it is hard to do any worse" camp, like Adam Dunn, Gordon Beckham and Alex Rios, but that is partially offset by having Paul Konerko almost guaranteed to decline. I don't like the White Sox pitching either. In the rotation is just a bunch of league average guys (Floyd, Danks, Humber) and they lost Buehrle. Guys like Chris Sale and Addison Reed could be good prospects, but their impact is definitely questionable. Going from Ozzie to Ventura will be a dramatic change on that team. I'm just not sure I like where they are right now.


5.) Minnesota Twins - 65-97



The cupboard is bare. The Twins are just beginning to enter into what the A's entered in 2007 (a prolonged period of mediocrity, or worse, after a long stretch of success). Mauer will probably be better, and Morneau has to be, but the team is just lacking impact on offense beyond those two. the pick-up of Josh Willingham is a nice move. He's been a starter for 6 years, and he's got a .838 OPS (121 OPS+) over that stretch. Really underrated guy. That said, they lost Michael Cuddyer who was always a consistent cog. Their pitching is just a mess. The Twins have basically four guys between 27 and 29 that are all basically the same (except for Liriano - who had an awful year in 2011 anyway). Slow fastball, pitch-to-contact guys that rely on the Twins defense. They can all either improve and regress, but probably offset each other. Sad times for a team who finally got a stadium that was worthy of their gallant play from 2002-2010.


AL West

1.) Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim - 96-66 (2)



Where to start with the most intriguing team of the AL. Obviously, they added Albert Pujols. Sure, he's supposedly 32 and coming off of his worst season as a pro, but that season improved greatly over the second half. Going to the AL could be an issue, but it wouldn't shock me to see Pujols at least repeat his 2011 numbers, which for 99% of the MLB populous wouldn't be all that bad. Trumbo probably won't have that type of year (and a sub-.300 OBP is not going to cut it much longer), but having a full season of Kendrys Morales is definitely a boost this team has been missing. When he went down for the first time in May 2010, Kendrys was arguably a top-5 hitter in the AL. Howie Kendrick had another nice solid year. Then, let's get to the pitching. No team has a better 1-4 than the Angels. The ace is probably Jered Weaver, who happens to be the best pitcher in the AL over the past two seasons. Dan Haren is the #2 and has been one of the best control pitchers for years, leading the league in SO/BB three of the last four seasons. Ervin Santana is above league average, and he is the number 4. CJ Wilson is a great #3, and he's now going to more a pitchers park than with the Rangers. Man, just imagine if Nick Adenhart never passed, what a great 1-5 this would be.


2.) Texas Rangers - 95-67 (4)


The Rangers only real loss in the offseason was CJ Wilson, but Yu Darvish could easily replace that production if he's close to what he was in Japan. Their offense is still very good, but there are age questions. Adrian Beltre is unlikely to put up numbers that good again as his prime comes to a close, and Mike Napoli almost definitely won't have that type of year again. The rest of their hitters are all in constant bands of production, with their other regulars all with  OPS+ between 87 (Elvis Andrus - who makes up with that with speed and defense) and 128 (Hamilton, who given his recent trend of alternating good seasons with awesome ones could be great in 2012. The Rangers pitching is still deep with guys who would all be solid #3s in Colby Lewis, Alexi Ogando, Matt Harrison and Derek Holland, with those last two still young and good enough to break out. Of course, there's Neftali Feliz as potentially a starter. I'm skeptical how that will work, because at least as  a closer he didn't seem to have the repertoire to be a starter.


3.) Seattle Mariners - 70-92


The Mariners have a lot of candidates to either have break-out years or bounce-back years. First the break-out of both Dustin Ackley, Justin Smoak and Jesus Montero. Ackley and Montero are both possible stars, with Ackley a newer version of Michael Young and Montero a guy who could be a star with the bat. Ichiro is probably a better bet to bounce-back than to continue his decline. Their pitching is suddenly a possible weakness (Felix Hernandez excluded who had a 'down' 2011 - 111 ERA+ - after incredible 2009-2010 seasons - 172-174 ERA+ -  but it still just 26 and entering his prime) after trading Pinieda and Fister over the past 10 months, but their pitching will always perform well in that beautiful ballpark of theirs. They don't have the caliber of players of the top two, but aren't all that far off - at least in terms of top-end talent, with depth being another issue altogether.


4.) Oakland Athletics - 66-96



This is Billy Beane's plan. He wants to bottom out. They went on a relative fire-sale this offseason trading both Gio Gonzalez and Trevor Cahill for a load of prospects that will all really begin to help Oakland by 2014 (Jarrod Parker, Gerrit Cole, Derek Norris). This has left the A's really bare in terms of major-league talent. Seth Smith was a nice acquisition for them, and Manny Ramirez may provide some benefit after he serves his suspension, but their offense is just awful. The surprise signing of Yeonis Cespedes is another move for 2014, not 2012. This is all fine. The A's want a new ball-park and unlike, say the Twins, they are building to be good when that ballpark comes. It may be some time from now, but Billy Beane has a plan.


AL Playoffs


AL Wild Card Round - Yankees 4 @ Rangers 6

The Rangers don't really have a front-line pitcher to throw at the Yankees (again, assuming Yu Darvish is not the next Fernando Valenzuela as a rookie), but they have a bull-pen that can hold down the Yankees. Obviously, this is completely random (like all playoff picks in baseball) so I really don't need to give a whole explanation.


ALDS (1) Angels over (4) Rangers  3 games to 2 & (2) Rays over (3) Tigers 3 games to 1

This can be an epic first round series, but I see the Angels slightly better pitching taking it. The Angels have the better premium pitchers, and the Rangers depth and bull-pen is less meaningful in such a short series. As for the Rays, they have the better pitching and arguably as good of an offense (certainly deeper 1-9).


ALCS (1) Angels over (2) Rays 4 games to 2


What pitching matchups we could see in this. Shields vs. Weaver. Price vs. Haren. Moore vs. Wilson. The best two pitching teams in the AL might even neutralize the bats in the series as well. I like the Angels because I think in each one of those pitching matchups, they have a slight advantage (the Rays definitely have better pitchers after the top-4 but that doesn't matter in the playoffs).


AL Champion: Los Angeles Angels

The Wire: Top 50 Characters - #4-1

(Part 1 - #50-37)
(Part 2 - #36-24)
(Part 3 - #23-11)
(Part 4 - #10-5)

I should say that I started this well before Grantland's 32-person bracket for the Wire. I disagreed with a lot of their seedings, but their voted Final-4 was the same as mine. I'll say this, my Final-2 and ultimate #1 are different. I'm not jumping on the "Omar is the Greatest Thing Ever" bandwagon. Anyway, let's finish this off.


4.) Jimmy McNulty




Oh, Jimmy. That damn likable bastard. He's the definition of a character who does a lot of hateable, awful shit but is truly charming enough to make people forget about him. While in a vacuum, all of his intentions were to actually do police-work, when studied in actuality, it was, as he admitted late in S1, to show just how brilliant he was. There was a reason everyone that was above him grew to hate him. He was disloyal to everyone except seemingly Bunny Colvin. He fought with Rawls and Burrell, but so did everyone else, but he also used Daniels, Lester and Carver and thought nothing of it. He drank himself into oblivion and slept with anything. Yet through it all, it was nearly impossible to not root for Jimmy McNulty. It was easy to call Elena McNulty an unfair bitch for trying to squeeze as much alimony and custody away from our Jimmy, but also truly easy to see why she was right. It was easy to call Bill Rawls an ass for putting McNulty on the boat, but also truly easy to see why the fact that McNulty would use him and Judge Phelan as pawns for his own benefit would be maddening. Jimmy McNulty was far from a good person, but he was a great character.

I didn't know until about halfway through S1 that Dominic West (who plays Jimmy) was British - something he shares with the actor of man #3. Looking back, that accent really comes through a lot early in S1, and what I thought was overly-drastic mouth movements when speaking was really just a way for him to get out words in a Bawlmer accent, but it does make West's performance all the more impressive. What really made his job, and the writer's job, that much more impressive was he so easily played a character that played hop-scotch with the ideas of good and bad, but seemed to only skirt those differences. Jimmy McNulty did some really reprehensible things like go behind his boss's back at every turn, or drive drunk and crash his car and then sleep with the seedy waitress (4:50). This extended to his police-work like the entirety of his S5 idea of faking a serial killer. However, it was easy to write that off as him being the lesser of so many evils. The fact that he really wasn't all that much better than those other evils made his character that much more interesting.

Jimmy McNulty was also really, really funny. Probably no scene better showed this then when he was supposed to go to the prostitute's room to catch them, but since the other police took too long, they opened the door to him having a threesome. His ability to charm anyone, whether it be Elena, Rhonda Pearlman, Beadie Russell, or even Teresa D'Agostino, without much ability, but also put all of them off the next day? That was gold. Jimmy McNulty was the perfect fun-loving cop. He was smart as all hell, but never missed out that he had, when finished with the political bullshit, a fun job. He wanted to catch the bad guys. He wanted to lock Stringer up, to never feel the sense that he was outsmarted. He just wasn't aware enough that he himself was a bad guy, a combative, abrasive man that would eventually turn on anyone.

Memorable Quotes:

"What the Fuck did I do?" "Honestly, I was looking for someone who cared about the kid. You're the one who made him take the years, right?", "You disappoint me String, I had such high hopes for us" (1:33), "Motherfuckers come to me and say, 'It's a new day, Jimmy.' Talkin' shit about how it's gonna change. Shit never fuckin' changes.", "Marlo's an asshole. He doesn't get to win. I get to win."


3.) Stringer Bell



Where to begin. Where to fucking begin. How many memorable moments? How many memorable speeches? How many memorable instances of trying to be a businessman in a Gangsta's world. Stringer Effin Bell. He might deserve to be a bit higher, but this is my list. I loved the character as a study. As just a character, he might have been the most brilliantly constructed - a man, who as Avon characterized perfectly, "Not street enough for this here, and maybe, just maybe, not smart enough for those out there." Stringer was smart. Stringer was the smartest man inside the game. He just wasn't smart enough outside of the game. He was a true businessman. He understood from McNulty, that there is a future in this game that didn't involve bodies, but just business. He wanted to be what the Greek was. Above it all. Just pushing good product around good territory, and let everyone get along while the fiends get high. He just wasn't sentient enough, or in reality, gangster enough, to see that The Game without those externalities of bodies and wars over territory was not The Game. Taking the hitting out of football leaves you with something exciting (flag football with final scores of 80-70), but not based in reality. Taking violence and ego out of The Game leaves you with more peace and cash, but is even further not based in reality. Stringer never understood this. Avon did. Stringer wanted to work in a world where the bottom-line was more important than one's name and reputation.

I never realized how strained the Avon-Stringer relationship was back even in S1 until I went back and watched it. Knowing how it would all ultimately end, it becomes more apparent earlier on that these two just had opposite views on where their organization was going. They both wanted money, but Avon wanted wealth. Stringer just wanted to have cash. Stringer wanted to be a CEO of a bank, a nameless individual with more cash than is truly imagineable. Avon wanted to be CEO of a record label, or a network. He wanted all that money, but in a place of power. Anyway, I'll talk more about Avon when we get to him. This is supposed to be about Stringer Bell.

What The Wire taught us early on was just how meticulous a drug kingpin needed to be. Stringer was always able to think about security and trace his steps at a moments notice. He was able to see that the cops were on to the pager and payphone system, so he was able to have the foresight to break the payphones in the pit. He saw that the cops would eventually break through the system of burners, so he meticulously made sure Bernard would get a maximum of two phones in stops all over Virginia and Maryland. He was a true boss of a business, down to keeping tabs on how many tenths of a mile Bodie drove his car to make sure he followed instructions. However, it was his belief that a legitimate business, that life outside The Game, would straight is what killed him. He thought the games and the thievery was limited to the drugs, but couldn't see that these same games were being played in broad daylight. It was his vulnerability, his naivete to this point that allowed him to be such an easy target to Clay Davis's long-con in S3, the start of his downfall. He wasn't ready to believe that the world he thought himself above (The Game) was so much like the world he aspired to be in (legitimate business). The only place he was truly at home was that copy-shop, where he could make sure a business was run as cleanly as he ran his life.

Memorable Quotes:

"That's like a 40 degree day. Nobody got nuttin' to say about a 40 degree day. 50? bring a smile to your face. 60? Shit, niggas damn near barbecuing. 20?  Niggas get they bitch on. But 40? Nobody give a FUCK about 40. And ya niggas are giving me way too many 40 degree days.", "We done worryin' about territory. What corner we got. The Game ain't about that anymore, the game about product. Product, muthafuckers. Product", "What is that?... Nigga, is you taking notes on a fucking criminal conspiracy?" (1:18), "No matter what we call heroin, it's gonna get sold. Shit is strong, we gonna sell it. Shit is weak, we gonna sell twice as much. You know why? Because a fiend, he gonna chase that shit no matter what.", "We ain't gotta dream no more, we got real shit." (1:42)


2.) Omar Little




 Oh man, the baddest mutha-fucka in Baltimore. Omar Little was a gay, clean-speaking stick-up boy. He had a code, he had morals. He never killed anyone outside the game. All of this is what defined Omar externally. It was a recipe for a memorable character, for a great character. The first time we saw Omar skillfully raid a Barksdale stash-house, and then saw him give away drugs for free to the poorest of the poor fiends, the 'Robin Hood' of 'The Game', and he did it all with his boyfriend beside him. Omar was God. He did anything he wanted against lethal competition. He would steal from the Barksdale organization, and later from Marlo Stanfield for fun, but it was his epic reaction to when he was challenged that made him all the more brilliant.

Omar Little's response to Avon's crew torturing Brandon showed the dark side of Omar Little. The side that would stop at nothing, including involving people unconnected to the terror of the Barksdale crew, to hit back. His cat and mouse game with Marlo and Chris Partlow was even more inspired, vindictive and destructive, to even Omar himself. He wouldn't survive that feud, but he died at the hands of a child and an environment he basically created. He became a mythological figure, a fake hero, a man to be respected and admired, and it was one of those kids, those people who knew the external beauty of Omar Little, but didn't understand the internal conflict, that offed him. Omar Little was way more complex than a broad gay stick-up artist who was against cursing.

Omar Little has been mythologized even in the real world. He's most people's consensus best character, and although it makes perfect sense, I feel like too many people focus on the smooth talking, the hilarious lines, the great attitude and what Omar represented. Of course, the beauty of the character, and almost every character on The Wire. It was his almost openly defiant way his lifestyle contrasted in The Game. In a world of Men, who was proudly gay. In a world that identified with 'Fuck Da Police' he spoke to the police all the time. But he knew that he wasn't perfect. He wasn't Robin Hood, and he might not even have been good. He knew in his heart that he was still a worker in The Game, that he needed it, that he fed off it, that he didn't do anything to stop it. That he wasn't a perfect role model, that he was just a man who wouldn't scare.

Top 10 Omar Quotes:

10.) "Tell the boss-man that you-know-who-it-is dropped Savino last night. You tell that man I'm going to drop all his muscle till he got the heart to come down to the street and dance."

9.) "Omar like it simple... Joe, I need you to resist your natural inclination to anything twisted up here in this play."

8.) "If I had known I'd be sharing quarters with all these boys, I probably wouldn't have robbed a lot of them"

7.) "I don't know about cards, but I think these .45's beat a full house. Banker, cash me out, yo"

6.) "Worryin' about you like worryin' if the sun gonna come up. Ain't about to wile out about it... and even at this range, if I miss, I can't miss"


5.) "Boy, you got me confused with a man who repeats himself" (same clip as #7, just further in)

4.) "A man gotta have a code."

3.) "It's all in the game." (Same clip as #8, but near the end)

2.) "Just like you man... I got the shotgun... you got the briefcase... it's all in the game though, right?"

1.) "Ay, Yo. Lesson here Bey: You come at the King, you best not miss"


1.) Avon Barksdale




Nothing encompassed The Wire quite like its original king, Avon Barksdale. Introduced early almost as a mythological figure that was heard but never seen (it took nearly half the season for any member of the original detail to get a real look at him), Avon grew into arguably the greatest example of the blurry lines between black and white on the show. I think most characters generally fall into the 'good' and 'bad' camps. Of course, the good have traits of bad people (Jimmy's alcoholism and womanizing) and the bad have traits of good (Stringer's business sense and true desire for non-violent drug trade), but Avon might have come the closest to the true axis. He's the 'zero-level' the man that who was a good person controlling a bad world. His largest bad trait was that he was a drug kingpin, that he made money off the dependence of fiends whose lives were already on the fast-track to an unmarked grave. That said, everything else that Avon Barksdale stood for were traits common among all heroes.

Avon was about loyalty and family. He inherited his position through his family. Everything Avon was - with the power, the legacy, the reputation, was due to his family, and he knew this and paid them back. He hosted charity dinners. He gave out good jobs to people in his family. He loved every member of his crew. His loyalty even beyond his family was special. Avon knew that his line of work wasn't what made him a man, that the values he believed in made him a man. When Cutty wanted out, told Avon that the game was not in him no more, Avon understood and let him go. Not only did he hold no ill-will toward Cutty (compare this to Marlo, who probably would have got Chris to stash Cutty behind one of those vacants), but he was cognizant enough to realize that Cutty was more of a man than most, that Cutty's honesty and self-realization was worth applauding, not demeaning. Later, Avon showed even more loyalty, when giving Cutty $15,000 straight cash to start his new gym, when Cutty himself was only asking for $10,000. (1:45) Avon gave you the sense that had Cutty asked for 50 large, Avon would have still obliged*. Cutty once gave his life to the Barksdale cause, and Avon wasn't a man who would forget.

* - There is a great Youtube comment on a clip of this scene. I can't take credit, but it is brilliant; anyway, here it is:

Avon: "10k? hell give him 15k"
Stringer: "ok 10k, but I want reciepts on everything shit's tax deductable"
Prop Joe: "I give you 20k now, but I want 20% of any of your fighter's winnings"
Marlo: " Chris get over here"

How brilliant is that?*


Avon's best scene might have been his speech to D'Angelo while standing over his comatose brother. Avon was able to realize just who he was, the situation and danger he found himself in every day, and that he owed his life to the people around him. That all of it could be taken away any day. Avon was more self-aware than any other player in The Game. When he fought with Stringer in S3 about the Marlo problem, Avon kept saying that The Game was about territory, that a non-violent Game just wouldn't work. Stringer had his more sensible idea, but Avon was always more practical. He could pinpoint early that Marlo was never going to be interested in co-ops and money, that he was interested in power; something Avon had in spades (witness him crossing the baseball field in prison and the inmates just stopping the game cold, without anyone saying a word). Avon had power and money, but he was more interested in legacy, in protecting what his people fought (and died) for in the towers, in respecting the game the way it was played and honoring those that fought in it the right way. This may have made him more close-minded than others, but nevertheless just as intriguing and in all honesty, more open and beautiful. Avon, the ultimate shade of perfect gray in a large spectrum of black and white mix.

Memorable Quotes:

"Since when do we buy corners? We take corners?... Shit, I don't think I was gonna be around this long... Yeah, I ain't no suit wearing businessman like you. I'm just a gangsta I suppose, and I want my corners!", "You know what the difference is between me and you? I bleed red, you bleed green. You know when I look at you these days, you know what I see? I see a man without a country" (0:50), "There's always gonna be a Marlo. No Marlo, no game.... Tonight, I'm just gonna kick back and see this view. Look at this shit... This is the same place. We used to run through this mutherfucker. We had every security guard in there following us... I told your ass not to steal a badtminton set. What you gonna do with a fucking net and a racket and we ain't got no yard!" (incredible scene, last with Bell & Barksdale). "He a man today. He a man.", ~FINGER WAG~ & "
Watch the Wire. It is the best 60 hours you will ever spend watching TV. Ever. It is so dramatically better than anything I have ever sen on the TV. Breaking Bad is a Hell of a Show. It is the best show currently on TV. The Wire blows it out of the water. Watch it. It is a gift.

About Me

I am a man who will go by the moniker dmstorm22, or StormyD, but not really StormyD. I'll talk about sports, mainly football, sometimes TV, sometimes other random things, sometimes even bring out some lists (a lot, lot, lot of lists). Enjoy.